Page 16 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 16

1

              The study of the media: theoretical approaches

               JAMES CURRAN, MICHAEL GUREVITCH AND JANET
                                    WOOLLACOTT







            In this chapter we  do  not attempt to chart systematically all the different
            approaches to the study of the mass media, each set in their different intellectual,
            social and historical contexts. Instead we have chosen to examine selectively the
            way in which different researchers have perceived the power of the mass media
            and to point to the different theoretical conceptions and empirical enquiries that
            have informed some of those perceptions. In particular, we have focused on the
            clashes and  common ground between different accounts  of the power  of  the
            media in three areas; in the distinctions between liberal-pluralist and Marxist
            approaches, often conceived of in terms of a distinction between empiricism and
            theory; in different approaches to the analysis of media institutions and finally in
            the different accounts of media power located in contemporary Marxist studies
            of the media.


                        THE POWER OF THE MEDIA: THEORY AND
                                      EMPIRICISM

            To a remarkable extent, there was a broad consensus during the inter-war period
            —to which many researchers, writing from a ‘right’ as  well as a ‘left’
            perspective subscribed—that the  mass  media exercised a powerful and
            persuasive influence. Underlying this consensus was (1) the creation  of  mass
            audiences on a  scale that was  unprecedented through the application of  new
            technology—the rotary  press, film and radio—to the mass  production of
            communications; (2)  a fashionable  though not unchallenged  view,  that
            urbanization and industrialization had created  a society that was volatile,
            unstable, rootless, alienated and  inherently  susceptible to manipulation; (3)
            linked to a view of urbanized man as being relatively defenceless, an easy prey to
            mass communication since he was no longer anchored in the network of social
            relations and  stable, inherited values that characterized settled,  rural
            communities; (4)  anecdotal but seemingly  persuasive evidence  that the  mass
            media had brainwashed people during World War 1, and engineered the rise of
            fascism in Europe between the wars.
              This encouraged a relatively uncomplicated view of the media as all powerful
            propaganda agencies  brainwashing a susceptible and defenceless public. The
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21