Page 205 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 205

Introduction














            As the preceding  section showed,  the view taken of  the relationship between
            media and society  influences the way in which  the  power of the media  is
            perceived. Two of the essays in this section—those by James Curran and Tony
            Bennett—see the media primarily in terms  of a  struggle for power between
            competing  social forces in which the media are both shaped by,  and in  turn
            influence, the course of this struggle. The remaining two essays in this section,
            by Peter Braham and Jay Blumler/Michael Gurevitch, analyse the influence of
            the  media in a more  eclectic way in terms of  their effectiveness  in shaping
            human behaviour and consciousness, viewed from a pluralist perspective.
              The opening essay by James Curran considers schematically the impact of the
            mass media over more than  a  millenium of history. He  maintains that the
            development of new techniques or institutions of communication has given rise
            to  new power centres, ranging  from the medieval  papacy to  modern  press
            magnates. The  emergence  of  these new power centres, he argues, has often
            generated new tensions within the dominant power bloc. Thus, the priesthood
            provoked dissension in the middle ages by seeking to  transform the  power
            structure; the rise of the book undermined, in turn, the authority of the priesthood
            in  early modern Europe;  and  more  recently professional communicators have
            become,  in some  ways, rivals  to professional politicians. More  generally, he
            examines the different social contexts in which mass media have amplified or
            contained class  conflicts.  In early nineteenth-century  Britain, he maintains,
            conflicts between a substantial section of the press and the dominant class both
            reflected and reinforced  growing fissures within  the social  structure.  More
            recently, he argues, the media have come to occupy a central role in maintaining
            support for the social system as a consequence of the close integration of control
            of the media into the hierarchy of power in contemporary Britain.
              Jay Blumler and Michael Gurevitch’s examination of the political effects of
            the mass media draws upon a different research tradition—survey-based research
            into  media effects in western  liberal democracies.  Their  essay challenges the
            ‘limited’ model of media influence advanced in the pioneering, highly influential
            studies into media political effects. The development of television, they argue,
            has  resulted in political  communications regularly reaching a segment  of the
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210