Page 252 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 252

242 POLITICAL EFFECTS
            communication  effects  should not be closed  after all. The literature began to
            resound with  ever more frequent references to  a ‘new look  in political
            communication research’ (Blumler and McLeod, 1974), to ‘new strategies for
            reconsidering media effects’ (Clarke and Kline, 1974) and even to ‘a return to
            the concept of powerful mass media’ (Noelle-Neumann, 1974). This new mood
            reflected three ground-swells of change, each undermining an essential prop of
            the reinforcement doctrine. These changes  inhered in trends  in the political
            environment, in the media environment and in the academic community itself.

                             Changes in the political environment

            The reinforcement doctrine of political communication was part and parcel of an
            overall view  that placed far  more emphasis on the underlying  stability of the
            world of politics than on its flux. As Lazarsfeld (1948) put it (p. xx, 2nd edn):
            The subjects in our study tended to vote as they always had, in fact as  their
            families always had.’
              Nowadays, however, party loyalty, once the linchpin of electoral psychology,
            seems to have lost much of its power to fix voters in their usual places. Political
            scientists in one democratic country after another have documented evidence in
            recent years of accelerating rates of electoral volatility. In the US, for example,
            there has been a steady downward trend in  ‘Presidential  elections  since  1952
            (only slightly  reversed in  1976) in  the capacity of self-disclosed ‘party
            identification’ to predict how people will actually vote. There has also been a
            concomitant  rise in the number of  those identifying  themselves as
            ‘Independents’.  Similar trends have been  reported from  Germany, Denmark,
            Sweden, Norway, Belgium and Holland. For Britain, Butler and Stokes (1974)
            have assembled an impressive array of evidence indicating ‘far greater volatility
            of party support’ in the 1960s than in earlier post-war years. Continuing their
            work into the 1970s, Crewe (1973 and 1976) has documented further falls, both
            in shares of the eligible electorate obtained by the Conservatives and Labour at
            successive elections, and steep declines (ranging from 46 per cent in 1964 to 23
            per cent in 1974) in the percentages of voters professing to be ‘very strongly’
            identified with some political party.
              Moreover,  a  number of signs suggest that the  combination  of weak
            partisanship and higher volatility rates is no passing phenomenon. For one thing,
            the power of social class to predict the ultimate destination of voters’ ballots is
            on the wane. That means that people are less likely to encounter a consistent and
            consistently reinforcing pattern of party loyalties in the work and social circles in
            which they move. For another, family socialization processes may no longer be
            capable of transmitting life-long partisan affiliations from parents to children as
            effectively as had been  supposed in the  past.  It  is  striking to note  in  this
            connection not only that the number of Independent identifications among new
            entrants to the US electorate went up steadily from 1952 to 1972, but also the
            lack of evidence that as the newly eligible mature politically they are abandoning
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257