Page 261 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 261

CULTURE, SOCIETY AND THE MEDIA 251
            given matter;  and  second, that  on this  occasion it  was the originally less
            committed voters who were most responsive to such a source of influence.


                            Media influence on trust in government
            Although much political communication research focuses on election campaigns,
            some social scientists have argued that the periods between elections are just as
            crucial for understanding the role of the media in the political life of society.
            This is reflected in the increasing research attention given in recent years to the
            influence of styles of political  reporting on people’s faith in their political
            institutions. Kurt  and Gladys Lang  (1966) were  the  first  to postulate such an
            influence. In their words,

              The mass media, by the way in which they structure and present political
              reality, may  contribute to a widespread  and chronic distrust of political
              life. Such distrust is not primarily a mark of sophistication, indicating that
              critical ‘discount’ is at work. It is of a projective character and constitutes a
              defensive reaction against the periodic political crises known to affect a
              person’s destiny as well as against what are defined as deliberate efforts to
              mobilise political sentiment…. How, we may ask, do the media encourage
              such distrust?…The answers must be sought in the way in which the mass
              media tend to emphasize crisis and stress it in lieu of the normal processes
              of decision making. Such distrust also has its roots in the complexity of
              events and of problems in which  the mass audience is  involved. For
              instance, since viewers bring little specialized knowledge to politics, even
              full TV coverage of major political events does not allay this distrust. In
              fact it may abet it. (Lang and Lang, 1966, pp. 466–7)

            Attempts to explore these matters empirically started when opinion polls  in
            several  countries  began to reveal  steep downward  trends in the readiness
            of voters to trust their political leaders' management of affairs. A further boost to
            this line of enquiry stemmed from the Watergate affair.
              One example of such research is a study by Michael J. Robinson (1976), an
            American political scientist who  shared  the  suspicion  that certain features of
            television news-reporting could have been responsible for the sharp decline of
            popular trust in government in the United States in recent years. He summarized
            his expectations as follows:

              My recent work in television has forced me to build a yet untested theory
              concerning the growth of political illegitimacy. I have begun to envision a
              two-stage process in which  television journalism, with its constant
              emphasis on social and political conflict, its high credibility, its powerful
              audio-visual capabilities and its  epidemicity, has caused the  more
              vulnerable viewers first to doubt their own understanding of their political
   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266