Page 276 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 276

266 HOW THE MEDIA REPORT RACE
            maintain there is no argument as to what constitutes news and that their duty is
            simply to publish it. Critics of media coverage within academic circles  and
            among the various race relations bodies in Britain  say that  the  media should
            acknowledge special responsibilities in reporting  race and  ought to handle
            racerelated stories with kid gloves. In their view to adhere to normal news values
            will exaggerate the extent of racial conflict and this will inevitably make race
            relations worse. Most journalists would probably consider these criticisms to be
            misplaced, mainly because this would be to demand ‘news as we would like it to
            be’ rather than ‘news as it is’.
              Of course,  this implies that  news  is somehow  immutable, unchanging  and
            obvious: that it ‘reports itself’, whereas critics of media coverage would say that
            news is  variously manipulated,  manufactured, shaped and suppressed.  It is  to
            throw light on what constitutes news in our society that the media coverage of
            race will be examined.


                    NEWS AS WE WOULD LIKE IT TO BE OR NEWS AS IT
                                           IS
            The claimed difference between ‘news as we would like it to be’ and ‘news as it
            is’ is best exemplified by the contrast between editorials and  news columns.
            While the news pages seem to be full of conflict and tension, editorials are likely
            to  emphasize harmony and the need for good race  relations. For example,
            referring to the arrival of the Malawi Asians the Daily Express editorialized:

              There is bound to be some dismay at the news that a further 25,000 Asian
              immigrants will be heading for Britain in the next few years…. Yet in a
              very real sense Africa’s loss is our gain. For in the main, these people are
              not layabouts looking for a cushy billet, but hard-working, ambitious and
              efficient traders. (10 May 1976)

            On the same day, the front page headline in the Express ran, ‘£1,000 PROBLEM
            OF A REFUGEE—REFUSED  WELFARE—BUT I’LL  SETTLE FOR A
            COUNCIL HOUSE’, and the story underneath ran:

              at Gatwick Airport yesterday Mr. Maroli knew the question to ask. ‘How
              do I get in touch with the British Welfare? I have been told that they can
              help me?’ But Mr. Maroli will have to fend for himself—the Officials at
              Gatwick knew about his £1,000 nest-egg.

            Butterworth’s analysis of the reporting of an outbreak of smallpox in Bradford in
            1962 is a valuable study of the contrast between what is written in the editorial
            columns and what appears on the news pages. The Yorkshire Post reported under
            the headline ‘ANGER IN BRADFORD’ that though there had as yet been no
            physical violence between blacks and whites, ‘there was open evidence that the
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281