Page 199 - Culture Technology Communication
P. 199

182                  Concetta Stewart, et al.


                Perhaps the greatest implication is that in the near future, it is
            that the Net is still dominated in both academe and the business
            world by the discourse patterns of the dominant white male society,
            so that those women and men who want to participate equally, in the
            fullest sense (be heard, responded to, and part of the decision-making
            process of any negotiation taking place) will have to use the dominant
            patterns in order to “market” themselves. There are implications for
            policy from the most basic levels involving civility in the classrooms
            to the development and deployment of the GII.
                While there is widespread recognition of the impact of new in-
            formation technologies on individuals, institutions and society, there
            is little consensus on what that impact is and how and whether
            there should be remediation. However, that there is an information
            or technology gap is indisputable—and these obstacles to equity in
            information technology exist, most specifically for women, minorities
            and the poor.
                Informed policy making has a role to play in addressing these
            inequities. Bowie (1990) states that it is the role of the government
            to protect the rights and interests of its citizens, especially the dis-
            advantaged:

                 What a government does for the human beings at the bottom
                 of its social order—its poor, its minorities, its children, its
                 women, its elderly, those who are underrepresented or un-
                 represented, as well as people who are handicapped, those
                 who are undereducated, and those who are generally in need
                 but cannot help themselves—defines the degree and quality
                 of justice that can be expected in practice.

            It appears, however, that the longer we wait to address this growing
            gap, the more likely we are to see these so-called “democratic” tech-
            nologies contribute to an increase in inequity in participation world-
            wide, rather than to the emergence of an inclusive global
            information economy.



            Notes

                  This manuscript appeared originally in the Electronic Journal of Com-
            munication/La revue electronique de communication, 8 (3 & 4), 1998 (see
            <http://www.cios.org/www/ejcrec2.htm>) and is reprinted by kind permission
            of the editors.
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204