Page 218 - Culture Technology Communication
P. 218

New Technologies, Old Culture             201

             you remember what happened to the one who was not protected by
             wasta!” My friend said no, and explained that she was out of the
             country when this article was originally published. Her friend ex-
             plained that as soon as word of the published interview reached
             Kuwait, it stirred quite a scandal in the local community, and both
             the girls’ reputations were blotched. The mother of the less “pro-
             tected” of the two students feared that this tarnish on her daughter’s
             reputation would prohibit her from being “suitably married.” The
             mother flew immediately to London, and discovered that, evidently,
             the student with “protection” (by her status) encouraged the other
             one to participate in the interview. As compensation for her irre-
             sponsibility and insensitivity, the mother demanded that her daugh-
             ter be married to one of the family’s eligible sons. Several months
             later, the less protected young woman was married, whether she
             wanted to be or not.
                 Another of my friends explains that during the Gulf War, she
             and a friend gave an interview to a Western newspaper describing
             women’s activities against Saddam’s occupation forces in Kuwait.
             They gave the interview based upon conditions of anonymity. But
             the reporter revealed so much personal information about the two
             women that “everyone” in Kuwait knew it was them who had spoken
             publicly about issues many Kuwaitis wanted to keep private. Ever
             since this experience, this friend of mine has kept a low profile.
                 These are examples of the kinds of stories (perhaps urban leg-
             ends?) that are told to reinforce boundaries between public and pri-
             vate discourse in Kuwait. The attempted murder of a Kuwaiti
             colleague of mine and her husband as they drove home from their
             chalet one evening in the spring of 1997 reveals the costs of being
             outspoken even for the very well-connected. Both she and her hus-
             band have rich public records of organizing for women’s rights (the
             wife, an outspoken woman’s activist) and fighting corruption in the
             misuse of public funds (the husband, a veteran MP). The sense was
             that this murder attempt was directed at the husband for his cam-
             paigns in parliament to oust those government ministers who were
             robbing the public of their livelihood, and who were looting the
             nest egg of future generations. Evidently he got too close to embar-
             rassing some very important people in public and they tried to per-
             manently remove him from office. This event took place in the
             middle of my fieldwork and was very disturbing as it revealed the
             degree to which some individuals would go to keep things quiet.
             Kuwait on the surface is a democracy, with a very free press. Mem-
             bers of parliament are very outspoken in the challenges they make,
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223