Page 105 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 105

More Equal than Others  87

            Impressionistically at least, it seems that dependence on the power of
        others in a large part of our world has been reduced over the past few gen-
        erations. Many of us feel less dependent than we assume our parents and
        grandparents to have been. Moreover, independence is a politically attrac-
        tive topic. Liberation and emancipation movements abound. Educational
        opportunities have been improved in many countries, and we have seen that
        power distance scores within countries decrease with increased education
        level. This does not mean, however, that the differences among countries
        described in this chapter should necessarily have changed. Countries can
        all have moved to lower power distance levels without changes in their
        mutual ranking as shown in Table 3.1.
            One may try to develop a prediction about longer-term changes in

        power distance by looking at the underlying forces identified in the previ-
        ous section. Of the factors shown to be most closely associated with power
        distance (latitude, size, and wealth), the fi rst is immutable. As to the sec-
        ond, size of population, one could argue that in a globalizing world small
        and even large countries will be less and less able to make decisions at
        their own level and all will be more and more dependent on decisions made
        internationally. This development should lead to a global increase in power
        distances.
            The third factor, wealth, increases for some countries but not for oth-
        ers. Increases in wealth may reduce power distances, but only if and where

        they benefit an entire population. Since the last decade of the twentieth
        century, income distribution in some wealthy countries, led by the United
        States, has become more and more uneven: wealth increases have benefi ted
        disproportionally those who were very wealthy already. This has the oppo-
        site effect: it increases inequality in society, not only in economic terms
        but also in legal terms, as the superrich can lobby with legislators and pay
        lawyers who earn a multiple of the salaries of judges. This kind of wealth

        increase, therefore, also increases power distances. In countries in which
        the economy stagnates or deteriorates (that is, mainly in countries that are
        already poor), no reduction or even a further increase in power distance is
        to be expected anyway.
            Nobody, as far as we know, has offered evidence of a convergence of
                                                       37
        countries toward smaller differences in power distance.  We believe that
        the picture of national variety presented in this chapter, with its very old
        historical roots, is likely to survive at least for some centuries. A worldwide
        homogenization of mental programs about power and dependence, inde-
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110