Page 144 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 144

I, We, and They  123

        cal. In collectivist societies, the reverse is true. As the distinction between
        “our group” and “other groups” is at the very root of people’s conscious-
        ness, treating one’s friends better than others is natural and ethical and is
        a sound business practice. Sociologists call this way of acting particular-
        ism; it is similar to what Misho’s analysis of the World Values Survey calls
        exclusionism.
            A consequence of particularist thinking is that in a collectivist society,
        a relationship of trust should be established with another person before
        any business can be done. Through this relationship the other is adopted
        into one’s in-group and is from that moment onward entitled to prefer-
        ential treatment. In Johannesson’s case this process of adoption took two
        years. During this period the presence of the Swedish businessman as an
        intermediary was essential. After the adoption had taken place, it became

        superfluous. However, the relationship was with Johannesson personally
        and not with his company. To the collectivist mind, only natural persons
        are worthy of trust, and via these persons their friends and colleagues
        become worthy, but not impersonal legal entities such as a company. In
        summary, in the collectivist society, the personal relationship prevails over the

        task and should be established first, whereas in the individualist society, the
        task is supposed to prevail over any personal relationships. The naive Western
        businessperson who tries to force quick business in a collectivist culture
        condemns him- or herself to the role of out-group member and to negative
        discrimination.


        Individualism, Collectivism, and the Internet

        Surveys and observations about the use of modern information and com-

        munication technologies (ICT) show significant differences among coun-

        tries. Most of these tools originated in a highly individualist society: the
        United States. ICT tools link individuals, so these tools are more easily,
        frequently, and eagerly used in individualist societies than in collectivist
        societies. In the latter, people have more direct ways to relate to their social
        environment. Along with societal individualism, two other cultural dimen-
        sions, masculinity and uncertainty avoidance, play a role in the use of ICT;
        we will deal with these influences in Chapters 5 and 6.

            Eurobarometer surveys have shown that people in more individualist
        European countries were more likely to have access to the Internet and to
        use e-mail. They more often used the computer for shopping, banking, and
        supplying information to public authorities. 48
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149