Page 254 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 254

What Is Different Is Dangerous  227

        ian, and Dutch Roman Catholicism are very different. Indonesian, Iranian,
        Saudi, and Balkan Islam mean quite different things to their believers and
        to their countries. Thai, Singaporean, and Japanese Buddhism have quite
        dissimilar affective and practical consequences.
            It is evident, as was suggested in Chapter 1, that religious conver-
        sion does not cause a total change in cultural values. The value com-
        plexes described by the dimensions of power distance, individualism or
        collectivism, masculinity or femininity, and uncertainty avoidance seem
        to have survived religious conversions. These value complexes may even

        have influenced to what extent a population has been receptive to cer-
        tain religions and how the accepted religion has evolved in that country.
        Indonesian (Javanese) mysticism has survived Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim,
        and Christian conversions. In the Christian countries, the Reformation has
        separated almost exactly those European countries once under the Roman
        Empire from the rest. All former Roman countries (the ones now speak-
        ing Romance languages) refuted the Reformation and remained Roman
        Catholic; most others became Protestant or mixed. Poland and Ireland
        were never part of the Roman Empire, but in their case Roman Catholicism
        provided an identity against non-Catholic oppressors.
            In establishing a relationship between uncertainty avoidance and reli-
        gious belief, it makes sense to distinguish between Western and Eastern
        religions. The Western religions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—are
        based on divine revelation, and all three originated from what is now called
        the Middle East. What distinguishes the Western from the Eastern reli-
        gions is their concern with Truth with a capital T. The Western revela-
        tion religions share the assumption that there is an absolute Truth that
        excludes all other truths and that human beings can possess. The differ-
        ence between strong and weak uncertainty- avoidance societies adhering

        to these religions lies in the amount of certainty one needs about having
        this Truth. In strong uncertainty- avoidance cultures, the belief is more fre-
        quent that “There is only one Truth and we have it. All others are wrong.”
        Possessing this Truth is the only road to salvation and the main purpose in
        a person’s life. The consequence of the others’ being wrong may be trying
        to convert them, avoiding them, or killing them.
            Weak uncertainty- avoidance cultures from the West still believe in
        Truth, but they have less of a need to believe that they alone possess it.
        “There is only one Truth and we are looking for it. Others are looking for it
        as well and we accept as a fact of life that they look in different directions.”
   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259