Page 285 - Cyberculture and New Media
P. 285

276                      Desistant Media
                             ______________________________________________________________
                             hyperbological accordance to a substantial subtext of dispossession. I suggest
                             that besides the historical phases we must also look for the ahistorical threads
                             – the  very continuums through the phases of different  media technologies.
                             Dispossessive  media  modes  of  both  Baroque  and  Romanticism  show  that
                             modern and modernist media art are not plain historical paradigm shifts but
                             also  certain  continuums  of  dispossession  produced  by  media  differencing
                             from the possessive mode, theorized historically by the onto-typology within
                             Western  thinking.  This  onto-typological  safeguard  of  mimesis  now  has  its
                             twin,  not oppositional to the  first  mentioned but as an Unheimlich pair, or
                             strange couple.
                                     Desistance, finally, is an oscillation protocol of media art that cannot
                             be historicized as a historical paradigm but as a manifestation of an artist free
                             from  the  constraints  of  technology.  As  a  Kunstkammer,  art  is  a  trace  of
                             ahistorical  motifs  and  themes,  pedagogically  concerned  with  a  myth  of
                                 145
                             man.   Even  though  the  resistant  mode  of  information  can  be  seen  as
                             domesticated, still many indicators let us speculate that the “Kunstkammer” –
                             the media lab – is still a place for magic to occur.

                                                          Notes

                             1
                               Cf. Puetz 2002.
                             2
                               Cf. Bolter & Grusin 2000, 236.
                             3
                               Johnson in Derrida 2004, viii-ix.
                             4
                                Sparks  1997,  xxii-xxiii.  Compare  “mimeme”  to  “meme”  in  Fuller  2005,
                             109-116.
                             5
                               Oswalds 1994, 254.
                             6
                                Cf.  Lacoue-Labarthe  1995,  46  and  Lacoue-Labarthe  1994,  152  and
                             especially  Lindberg  1998,  33-36.  About  Nazi  onto-typology,  see  Lacoue-
                             Labarthe 1990, 93-99.
                             7
                               Lacoue-Labarthe 1994, 152.
                             8
                               This discussion is described in Tikka 2005, see e.g. 106 and 120. The very
                             problematic substance of this thinking is cited in a direct quotation from Jean
                             Mitry: “a film is a mirror in which we recognize only what we present to it
                             through what it reflects back to us: all it ever reflects is our image”. This is a
                             loop (of consciousness). See also Zapp 2002, 78.
                             9
                                Bolter  1991,  226.  See  also  Bacon  1994,  80:  audiovisual  experience  in
                             general  functions  as  a  substitute  for  the  lack  of  participation  in  the  world;
                             there’s  a  movement  away  from  tactile  towards  visual  experience  as  a
                             movement  toward  greater  abstraction  and  formalism  divorced  from  actual
                             experience that, according to Bacon, increases the sense of consciousness as
                             something separate and alienated from the world. What is behind this thought
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290