Page 286 - Cyberculture and New Media

Seppo Kuivakari 277
______________________________________________________________

is that film (audiovisuality) functions as a form of “epistemological
repression” by suggesting that reality is essentially material and visible –
capable of being captured by the camera.
10
Lanham 1993, 3-28 & 31-52.
11
Bolter & Grusin 2000, 41.
12
Lanham 1993, 40-41 and Bolter & Grusin 2000, 39.
13
Manovich 2001, 208.
14
Phelan 2003, 106-107.
15
Haraway 1997, 182.
16
Derrida 1976, 288.
17
Krauss 1994, 87.
18
Cf. e.g. Bolter 1991, 226.
19
Silverman 1996, 18.
20
Silverman 1999, 81-82.
21
Derrida 1976, 163.
22
Ulmer 1985, 189.
23
Cf. Puetz 2002; Lacoue-Labarthe 1989, 255. Interpretations, emphasized
with italics, are mine.
24
Lacoue-Labarthe 1989, 70. Cf. the “pretend theory” of media and film
ecology.
25
Lindberg 1998, 33-34. Fictioning differs from the mode speculated by
pretend and simulation media theories.
26
Lacoue-Labarthe 1994, 18. Lacoue-Labarthe recalls the mythic stages upon
the idea: he says that myth, defined as the primitive and anonymous poem of
the people is thought of in the modern age as the only means of identification
that authorizes even the fitting recognition of a nation.
27
Lacoue-Labarthe 1993, 107-109.
28
Le Grice 2002, 234.
29
Lacoue-Labarthe & Nancy 1997, 17.
30
Bolter & Grusin 2000, 84.
31
In Lacoue-Labarthe 1989, 15.
32
Ibid. 16-17.
33
Kittler 1997, 87.
34
Lacoue-Labarthe 1993, 97-98.
35
Lacoue-Labarthe 1994, 152.
36
Lacoue-Labarthe 1990, 80-81.
37
Ibid., 81.
38
For arche-violence see Derrida 1976 and 1978.
39
Lacoue-Labarthe 1993, 150.
40
Simon Sparks in the introduction to Lacoue-Labarthe & Nancy 1997, xxiii-
xxiv.