Page 292 - Cyberculture and New Media

Seppo Kuivakari 283
______________________________________________________________

143
Morse 1996, 199.
144
Viola 1990, 483-484. Bill Viola is not an “interactive artist”, as Rokeby
has termed the work of many contemporary artists. In his latter works, with
references to e.g. angels and other religious matter, there’s a hint that his
oeuvre can be defined with the Latin term “lustro” – spiritual cleansing with
fire and water.
145
Cf. Grau 2007, especially 146: this “Kunstkammer” turned into
th
“Wunderkammer” as Grau says, cabinet of wonder, later at the 19 century
including optical and aural attractions such as peep shows, distorting mirrors
and tableaux of miniature landscapes. Also here art deals with the popular
through “magic”.

Bibliography

Aarseth, Espen (1997): Cybertext. Perspectives on Ergodic Literature.
Baltimore & London, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Abel, Manuela (ed.) (1997): Jeffrey Shaw – a User’ Manual. From Expanded
Cinema to Virtual Reality. Ostfildern, Edition ZKM/Cantz.

Allen, Richard and Murray Smith, (eds.) (1997): Film Theory and
Philosophy. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Anderson, Joseph D. (1996): The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach
to Cognitive Film Theory. Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois
University Press.

Aristotle (1992): Politics. Harmondsworth, Penguin Classics.

Aristotle (1996): Poetics. Harmondsworth, Penguin Classics.

Arns, Inke (2004): “Social Technologies. Deconstruction, Subversion and the
Utopia of Democratic Communication” in Frieling, Rudolf & Dieter Daniels
(Hg./eds. 2004): Media Art Net 1 Survey of Media Art. Wien/New York,
Springer.

Bacon, Henry (1994): Continuity and Transformation – The Influence of
Literature and Drama on Cinema as a Process of Cultural Continuity and
Renewal. Helsinki, Suomalainen tiedeakatemia.