Page 40 -
P. 40

Information Asset Management      19




                Table 2-1 Capability-based Information Management Maturity Model.

                IMM Stage        Description
                Initial          The organization is entrepreneurial; individuals have authority over data, so information
                                 maturity is chaotic and idiosyncratic. Business rules or criteria for behavior are
                                 nonexistent. Data quality is far from integrated, and data handling is costly.
                Repeatable       Departmental data becomes the norm. Any sophistication in usagedsuch as
                                 analysisdis departmental, specialized, and costly.
                Defined           The organization starts to consider an enterprise view, and looks for some sort of
                                 integration across applications and silos. A desire for data accountability evolves.
                                 Strategic alignment to the business becomes an activity in IT. Standards are developed,
                                 and data quality becomes formal and may centralize. Data usage becomes more
                                 common, and efficiency of data management improves.
                Managed          Data and content assets are tracked, lineage of all content is understood and
                                 documented. Analytical results are used to close process loops. Emails, documents,
                                 and web content are also managed, and can be called up alongside “rows and
                                 columns.” Data quality is built into processes instead of being corrected post facto.
                Optimized        There is no need to determine if information assets are managed effectivelydthey are
                                 woven into the fabric of the organization. There are effective measures in place to allow
                                 information management to support business innovation. The organization can place
                                 a value statement on its content, if not the balance sheet.





               Things Will Change

               The reason you are reading this book is that something is amiss with your data. By definition, if
               something is wrong, it needs to be fixed. Fixing anything means making a change to ensure that the fix
               is never needed again. The bottom line is that data governance is not done with an expectation of
               “business as usual” across your business and technology functions. There will be changes. Some of
               them will not be well received. Part of deploying DG means managing changes.


               INFORMATION ASSET MANAGEMENT

               The last concept has been deliberately positioned at the end of this chapter. So far, we have mentioned
               that data governance is a key element of managing data assets. We have contrasted DG with infor-
               mation management and reviewed the specific solutions that may trigger IM and DG. Now we need to
               talk about the asset aspect and frame our concepts within information asset management (IAM). We
               have found it better to save the whole “information as an asset” discussion until after the relationship of
               data governance to data management is established.
                  IAM describes a business-based approach to ensure that data, information, and content are all
               treated as assets in the true business and accounting sensedavoiding increased risk and cost due to
               data and content misuse, poor handling, or exposure to regulatory scrutiny. Please go back and review
               that sentence. Applying data governance means treating data as an asset, but not in a metaphorical
               sense. We truly mean as a real business asset. You may not see your “information value” on a balance
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45