Page 66 - Decision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems
P. 66

Multicriteria decision-making methodologies Chapter | 1  37


             [33] A. Werner, A. Werner, R. Wieland, K.-C. Kersebaum, W. Mirschel, H.-P. Ende, et al., Ex
                 ante assessment of crop rotations focusing on energy crops using a multi-attribute deci-
                 sion-making method, Ecol. Indic. 45 (2014) 110 122.
             [34] M. Kabak, E. Ko ¨se, O. Kırılmaz, S. Burmao˘ glu, A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making
                 approach to assess building energy performance, Energy Build. 72 (2014) 382 389.
             [35] A. Mattiussi, M. Rosano, P. Simeoni, A decision support system for sustainable energy
                 supply combining multi-objective and multi-attribute analysis: an Australian case study,
                 Decis. Support Syst. 57 (2014) 150 159.
             [36] E.W. Stein, A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production tech-
                 nologies, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 22 (2013) 640 654.
             [37] J.M. S´ anchez-Lozano, J. Teruel-Solano, P.L. Soto-Elvira, M. Socorro Garc´ ıa-Cascales,
                 Geographical information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)
                 methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: case study in south-eastern Spain,
                 Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 24 (2013) 544 556.
             [38] H. Davoudpour, S. Rezaee, M. Ashrafi, Developing a framework for renewable technol-
                 ogy portfolio selection: a case study at a R&D center, Renewable Sustainable Energy
                 Rev. 16 (2012) 4291 4297.
             [39] L. Wang, L. Xu, H. Song, Environmental performance evaluation of Beijing’s energy use
                 planning, Energy Policy 39 (2011) 3483 3495.
             [40] G.-H. Tzeng, J.-J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications,
                 Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, 2011.
             [41] M. Behzadian, S. Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, J. Ignatius, A state-of the-art
                 survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012) 13051 13069.
             [42] Y.-J. Lai, T.-Y. Liu, C.-L. Hwang, TOPSIS for MODM, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 76 (1994)
                 486 500.
             [43] J.R.S.C. Mateo, TOPSIS, Multi Criteria Analysis in the Renewable Energy Industry,
                 Springer, 2012, pp. 43 48.
             [44] D. Streimikiene, T. Baleˇ zentis, Multi-criteria assessment of small scale CHP technologies
                 in buildings, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 26 (2013) 183 189.
             [45] E. Bas, The integrated framework for analysis of electricity supply chain using an inte-
                 grated SWOT-fuzzy TOPSIS methodology combined with AHP: the case of Turkey, Int.
                 J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 44 (2013) 897 907.
             [46] A. Sarkar, A TOPSIS method to evaluate the technologies, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage.
                 31 (2013) 2 13.
             [47] D. Choudhary, R. Shankar, An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and
                 selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India, Energy 42 (2012)
                 510 521.
             [48] R. Dapkus, D. Streimikiene, Multi-criteria assessment of electricity generation technolo-
                 gies seeking to implement EU energy policy targets, Proc. Econ. Dev. Res. 55 (2012)
                 50 56.
             [49] T. Kaya, C. Kahraman, Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified
                 fuzzy TOPSIS methodology, Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 6577 6585.
             [50] H. Doukas, C. Karakosta, J. Psarras, Computing with words to assess the sustainability of
                 renewable energy options, Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010) 5491 5497.
             [51] M.-T. Chu, J. Shyu, G.-H. Tzeng, R. Khosla, Comparison among three analytical methods
                 for knowledge communities group-decision analysis, Expert Syst. Appl. 33 (2007)
                 1011 1024.
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71