Page 112 - Decoding Culture
P. 112

J
                                          SITUATING SUB E CTS   105
          dialectic'  (ibid:  53) . This they believe  to be part of a  significant
          move away from the restrictions of the Althusserian view of ideol­
          ogy  and  subject constitution.  Others  less  friendly to  the  Screen
          project  - for  example  those  working  within  the  Centre  for
          Contemporary  Cultural  Studies  during  the  1970s,  such  as  Hall
          (1980c)  and Morley  (1980a)  - are not convinced that psychoana­
          lytic  concepts  are  adequate  to  this  task.  For  them,  the
          psychoanalytically based account of the constitution of the subject
          is insufficient to comprehend 'particular discourses or historically
          specific ideologies in definite social formations' (Hall,  1980c:  161).
          Unable to handle social variation in the operation of ideology and
          subjectivity, the psychoanalytic framework tends instead to reduce
          it to supposedly universal processes.
            It is this charge of misleading reductionism that is most com­
          monly  (and most persuasively)  levelled at Screen theory's use of
          the psychoanalytic perspective. It is not hard to see why. Although
          Lacan's  structuralist adaptation  of Freudian  thought  does  make
          radical changes in some areas, it still uses concepts which by their
          very  nature  refer  to  essentially  trans-cultural  processes.  The
          mirror  stage,  Oedipal  relations, castration  anxiety,  Name-of-the­
          Father, the Phallus as signifier, all this familiar apparatus presumes
          to  identify  aspects  of human  subject  formation  which  operate
          regardless of specific social circumstances. Such universal claims
          are,  of  course,  fundamental  to  the  psychoanalytic  project.
          Inevitably this gives rise to a marked tension between psychoana­
          lytic theories and those more sociological or historical perspectives
          within  which  socio-cultural  variation  is  a  defining  feature.
          Sometimes this can be a constructive tension, as it arguably was in
          the work of the Frankfurt School.  But for that to be so, it is first
          necessary that the concepts derived from each theoretical 'side' are
          conceived as non-reductive and so open to comparative judgement
          and, if necessary, mutual modification. In the case of Screen theory





                              Copyrighted Material
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117