Page 110 - Decoding Culture
P. 110

SITUATING SUBJ ECTS    103

          repositioning of a  (non-unitary, radically heterogeneous)  subject'
          (Ellis,  1977: n.p.). Whatever else it may be, this is hardly the lan­
          guage to be expected from a simple model of ideological constraint
          through subject positioning. It is, rather, the product of a constantly
          developing body of thought which at any given moment was com­
          posed of elements that did not necessarily sit entirely easily with
          each other.
             In  this context, then, there  is no doubt that the proponents of
          Screen theory were fully aware that there were complex interactive
          processes involved  in the relations between  'readers',  'texts'  and
          ideology; to suggest otherwise  (as some accounts have)  is to per­
          petrate something of a calumny upon the journal's work. Even so,
          the theoretical and methodological choices that were made in con­
          structing Screen theory inevitably had consequences for quite how
          those processes were to be understood  and,  therefore, set limits
          upon the ways in which the relationship between texts and readers
          could  be conceptualized.  Let us examine some of those limits by
          drawing together Screen theory's concept of ideology, its emphasis
          on psychoanalytic theory, its understanding of the subject, and its
          conception of reader-text relations. Though this may be a some­
          what artificial synthesis,  a convenient fabrication that never quite
          existed  in  this form,  it will  serve to  suggest the  broad  thrust of
          Screen theory's ontological and theoretical commitments.
            We  must  begin  with  ideology,  which  was  a  key  concept  in
          British cultural studies generally in the 1970s, so much so that one
          retrospective observer  (Carey,  1989:  97)  noted that 'British  cul­
          tural  studies  could  be described just as easily and  perhaps more
          accurately as ideological studies for they assimilate, in a variety of
          complex ways,  culture  to  ideology'.  At  its least elaborated,  this
          meant that a loose concept of ideology was widely seen as a useful
          way to frame cultural analysis, both socially and politically. If forms
          of culture could be shown to  be 'ideological', to  serve particular





                              Copyrighted Material
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115