Page 105 - Decoding Culture
P. 105

98  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE

          ideas. Consider, for example, the following superficially simple pas­
          sage from his well-known essay The Signification of the Phallus':
             For the phallus is a signifier, a signifier whose function, in the intra­
             subjective economy of the analysis, lifts the veil perhaps from the
             function  it  performed  in  the  mysteries.  For  it  is  the  signifier
             intended to designate as a whole the effects of the signified, in that
             the signifier conditions them by its presence as a signifier. (Lacan,
             1977: 285)
          These two sentences defy clear understanding, and while the first,
          though highly condensed, may reasonably be argued to depend on
          already grasping the whole framework of Lacan's thinking,  the
          second  is problematic simply because of the twists and impreci­
          sions of its construction. As it happens, I believe I know to what it
          alludes. But it is precisely that allusive character of Lacanian writ­
          ing  which  makes  it  so  difficult to  grasp  with  any  certainty.  And
          lest any reader think that I am.perpetrating a deception by remov­
          ing the passage  from the context in which  it appears, I insist that
          nowhere in that essay is there a contextualization which will ease
          this problem of interpretation.
             Although I am not positively disposed to such wilfully obscure
          writing, my observation here is not intended as a specific criticism
          of Lacan nor of those  theories which utilize his work.  I  am  con­
          cerned, rather, to underline the difficulty of dealing with Lacanian
          psychoanalytic concepts, and to suggest how strong is the potential
          for ambiguity, misunderstanding and disagreement in the applica­
          tion  of such  ideas  in  cultural  studies. Thus,  although  there  are
          clear and useful accounts of the role of Lacanian concepts in Screen
          theory - Lapsley and Westlake (1988) comes to mind  - I doubt that
          any  summary would  command  widespread  agreement  among
          those who were party to these developments.  Here,  therefore,  I
          shall  only be concerned  with  some  of the  foundational  ideas  as
          they were mediated  into  cultural  studies via  Screen  theory,  and





                              Copyrighted Material
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110