Page 104 - Decoding Culture
P. 104

SITUATING  U B J E C TS  97
                                                      S
           In this way a congruence is established in Screen theory between
           the Althusserian account of ideology and other of Screen's influ­
           ences  of the  period,  most  notably  Brecht,  Barthes'  intensive
          reading strategy in S/Z,  and, influenced by Barthes and psycho­
           analysis,  the  much-trumpeted  Cahiers  du  Cinema  symptomatic
           reading of Ford's film Y o ung Mr Lincoln  (Editors  of Cahiers  du
           Cinema, 1972) .
             The question then arises, as it does also for Althusser: what are
          the mechanisms of subject formation? In both Althusser and Screen
          theory the  answer is to be found in the application of psychoana­
          lytic concepts in general, and in the work of Lacan in particular. For
          psychoanalysis,  in its  focus upon  'the  extraordinary adventure
          which  from birth  to  the  liquidation  of the  Oedipal  phase  trans­
          forms a small animal conceived by a man and a woman into a small
           human child'  (Althusser,  1977: 189) , is no more (or less)  than the
           science  that  studies  the basic formation  of human  subjects.  And
          although so much of the focus of psychoanalytic theory is upon the
           earliest stages of that formation  (Lacan's 'mirror stage'; the Oedipal
           phase; etc.) the concepts which are developed in this context give
           access  to  the  later  operations  of the  unconscious  and  to  later
           processes of subject constitution. It is this which gives rise to the
           emerging  strategy,  already  seen  with  Metz,  of applying  Lacan's
           ideas metaphorically to the circumstances of film spectatorship. I
          shall pick up that thread later, in Chapter 6. For the present, how­
          ever,  we  must  give  a  little  more  thought  to  the  role  of
          psychoanalytic  concepts  in  the  further  development  of Screen
          theory.
             This  is not easy. Lacan is famously difficult to understand, let
          alone to summarize, and while it is one thing to recognize a prima
          f a cie case for psychoanalytic concepts in examining subject forma­
          tion, it is  quite  another to grasp the full detail of their application
          when  faced with the  style  in  which  Lacan  typically  presents his





                              Copyrighted Material
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109