Page 103 - Decoding Culture
P. 103

96  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE

           personality, or what have you) but of ideology, and Althusser uses
           the term 'interpellation' to describe the process whereby ideology
           turns  individuals  into  specific  kinds  of subjects.  Ideology,  as  it
           were, summons individuals, 'hails' them, as he also puts it, situates
           them as seemingly natural subjects of a certain kind. Nor is there
           any  existence  outside  of  this  process  for,  to  use  another  of
           Althusser's key phrases, we are 'always-already' subjects. There is
           no escape from interpellation and ideology.
             This, then, is very much an account of ideology-in-general, so
           much so that it would not be unreasonable to conclude that this
           concept of ideology more or less equates to a generalized concept
           of culture. Two features, perhaps, militate against such a conclu­
           sion. First, Althusser does believe that in 'science' it is possible to
           find  a  subjectless  discourse,  to  escape ideology,  and  secondly,
           ideology still constitutes an  imaginary relationship of people to
           their real circumstances. These views (however difficult it would
           be to sustain the former) ensure that Althusser's concept retains
           a  critical  edge  which  would  not  necessarily  be  present  in  a
           descriptive concept of culture, provoking analysis which unpacks
           the  illusions  of subject  positioning  through which  the  real  cir­
           cumstances  of people's  lives  are  mediated. The  implication  for
           cultural studies is clear. In as much as the fundamental ideologi­
           cal operation is that of constituting subjects, then the first and vital
           moment of cultural analysis must be that which  shows how  spe­
           cific forms perform interpellation. What is the nature  of subject
           formation  in,  for  example,  the  classic  realist  text  (MacCabe,
           1974)? And is it possible (as Screen theory was inclined to argue)
           to  produce  texts  and  readings  of texts  which foreground  and
           undermine  these  processes  of subject formation? The former
           leads  to  an  avant-garde  aesthetic  practice;  the  latter  to  an
           approach  to 'reading' which seeks  out the fractures in the text
           itself, the slips, the points of subversion of the ideological project.





                              Copyrighted Material
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108