Page 102 - Decoding Culture
P. 102

SITUATING SUBJECTS  95

          upon  distortion, viewing  ideology  as a departure  from truth,  as
          something which can be, even  must be, transcended. Althusser's
          conception  is much  more  comprehensive  in  the  social  function
          that it affords to ideology,  so much so that, for him, social life is
          inconceivable without it. Even before his 'ideological state appara­
          tus' essay he was making  such  substantial claims: 'ideology  (as a
          system of mass representations) is indispensable in any society if
          men are to be formed, transformed and equipped to respond to the
          demands of their conditions of existence'  (Althusser,  1969: 235).
          He grounds  his  account  in two basic  propositions.  Ideology,  he
          says (Althusser, 1977: 153) 'represents the imaginary relationship
          of individuals to their real conditions of existence' and, secondly,
          'ideology has a material existence' (ibid: 155), it exists not in some
          ideational domain but in social practices and apparatuses. An indi­
          vidual  caught within  ideology  lives  it  out through the  practices
          which give it material form.  S/he  is rendered  a 'subject' in and
          through those practices which articulate his/her imaginary rela­
          tionship with real conditions.
            This is the  heart  of Althusser's theory:  'all ideology  has the
          function (which defines it) of "constituting" concrete individuals as
          subjects'  (ibid:  160) .  In  other  words,  the  fundamental  category
          through which human beings are incorporated within ideology is
          that of the subject. Although it may seem obvious to us that we are
          individuals with a certain kind of identity, it is precisely this trans­
          parency  which  is so important to the  operation of ideology.  'It  is
          indeed a peculiarity of ideology that it imposes (without appearing
          to do so,  since these are "obviousnesses") obviousnesses as obvi­
          ousnesses, which we cannot/ail to recognize and before which we
          have the inevitable and natural reaction of crying out  (aloud or in
          the "still, small voice of conscience"): 'That's obvious! That's right!
          That's true!'" (ibid: 161). Recognition of ourselves as subjects, how­
          ever,  is  a product not  of a  natural  state  of being  (identity,  soul,





                              Copyrighted Material
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107