Page 97 - Decoding Culture
P. 97

90  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE

           everything may come to be projected, there is one thing and one
           thing only that is never reflected in it:  the  spectator's own body'
           (ibid: 45). In the Lacanian mirror stage the child's (mis)recognition
           of its own body in the mirror gives rise to a unified sense of self, a
           differentiation of the ego, and ultimately facilitates entry into the
           Symbolic which is the world of the Law and language. The child
           identifies with  its like  in the  mirror.  But,  Metz  asks  of the film
           'mirror',  where is the spectator's ego  in relation to the cinematic
           signifier? With  what  does the  spectator identify?  He offers two
           interlinked solutions to this puzzle. At one level, he suggests some­
           what obscurely, the spectator identifies 'with himself as a pure act
           of perception  (as wakefulness, alertness) : as the condition of pos­
           sibility of the  perceived  and  hence  as  a  kind  of transcendental
           subject, which comes before every there is'  (ibid: 49). This is pri­
           mary cinematic identification, identification with one's own 'look'.
           In fiction films, in addition, he suggests that there is a secondary
           cinematic identification: that with characters and through the looks
           of characters within and outside the frame.
             This  stress  on  perception  (the  cinema,  he  says,  is  'more  per­
           ceptual' than  many forms of expression)  is then  extended  into  a
           concern  with  voyeurism  (scopophilia)  in  an  account  of what he
           calls  'the  scopic  regime  of the  cinema'  (ibid:  61) .  This  is again
           established via a series of resemblance claims, the distinctive char­
           acter of which is caught in the following passage:
             For its spectator the film unfolds in that simultaneously very close
             and definitively inaccessible 'elsewhere' in which the child sees the
             amorous play of the parental couple, who are similarly ignorant of
             it and leave it alone, a pure onlooker whose participation is incon­
             ceivable.  In  this  respect  the  cinematic  signifier  is  not  only
             'psychoanalytic'; it is more precisely Oedipal in type. (ibid: 64)

           There  is  a  typical  slide  here  (film - inaccessible  'elsewhere' -
           seeing amorous play of parental couple - Oedipal - film)  in which





                              Copyrighted Material
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102