Page 96 - Decoding Culture
P. 96

SITUATIN G   SUBJECTS  89

          this quotation is taken, first appeared in English in Screen  (Metz,
          1975)  and was  to prove a significant step in the journal's move­
          ment  toward  a  theory  and  method  of  analysis  utilizing
          psychoanalytic concepts.
             In this essay Metz addresses the question, 'what contribution
          can Freudian psychoanalysis make to the study of the cinematic
                                )
          signifier?' (Metz,  1982: 17 .   Whilst recognizing a number of differ­
          ent  possibilities  (notably  films  treated  as  'symptoms'  of  the
          neuroses of their makers, psychoanalysis of what he calls the 'film
          script', and psychoanalysis of specific textual  systems)  his major
          concern is with developing a psychoanalytic approach not to indi­
          vidual  films  but  to  the  cinematic  signifier  itself:  'a  direct
          examination,  outside any particular film,  of the psychoanalytic
          implications  of the  cinematic'  (ibid:  36).  Once  more,  then,  he
          returns to his familiar fascination with the uniquely cinematic fea­
          tures  of film. To  do  so  he  leans  on  a number of concepts drawn
          from Lacan's 'structuralist' revision of Freudian theory,  as well as
          on Freud's own work, using resemblances and parallels between
          the film spectator's situation and that of the psychoanalytic 'subject'
          to  tease  out what  he  considers  to  be  fundamental  features  of
          cinema.
            The major psychoanalytic resources on which he draws in his
          examination of cinematic perception  are  Lacan's  account of the
          'mirror stage' and the more general emphasis on Oedipal relations
          in Freudian and Lacanian theory. But, employing a methodological
          strategy which will later  become  common  in  psychoanalytically
          disposed film theory, he does not apply these ideas directly, using
          them, rather, to draw parallels and make metaphoric comparisons.
          So, for instance, presupposing the utility of Lacan's mirror stage
          concepts (and, indeed, our familiarity with them)  he likens film to
          a - the - mirror.  Thus film is like the mirror. But it differs from the
          primordial mirror in one essential point: although, as in the latter,





                              Copyrighted Material
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101