Page 106 - Decoding Culture
P. 106

SITUATIN G   SUB E C TS  99
                                                        J
         even then only in the most schematic and restricted form. This will
         be sufficient to the task in hand, that of characterizing the basic ele­
         ments of Screen theory.
            Lacan  reconstructs  Freudian  theory  in  terms  of the  insights
         afforded by structural linguistics and by structuralism more gen­
         erally.  There  are  many  points  at  which  one  might  begin  an
         exposition, but since we have already had a passing encounter with
         it in the context of Metz' semiotics, the 'mirror stage' will serve that
         purpose  here. The  account of the  mirror stage  grew,  for  Lacan,
         from 'the  startling spectacle  of the infant in front of the  mirror'
         (Lacan, 1977: 1) . The infant (prior to the age of 18 months) encoun­
         ters  and  responds enthusiastically  to  its image  in the  mirror.  It
         sees itself, misrecognizes self as an  ideal ego,  as  a whole,  in the
         image. Lacan  (ibid: 2) puts it thus: This jubilant assumption of his
         specular image by the child at the infans stage,  still  sunk in his
         motor incapacity and nursling dependence, would seem to exhibit
         in an exemplary situation the symbolic matrix in which the I is pre­
         cipitated in a primordial form, before it is objectified in the dialectic
         of identification with the other, and before language restores to it,
         in the universal, its function as subject.'
            This passage leads out to  many of the key features of Lacan's
         thinking which played a part in Screen theory. In the mirror phase,
         'the I,' Lacan says, 'is precipitated in primordial form'. In effect, the
         infant's encounter with the mirror image is the first step along the
         road toward the constitution of a subject, a self. It is a pre-linguistic
         and  pre-symbolic step, taken in the subjective domain that Lacan
         speaks of as the Imaginary, but it is also a misrecognition (Lacan's
         term meconnaissance carries additional meanings relating to mis­
         knowing) of the 'Ideal-I' as unified. Later, in the infant's encounter
         with  language  and,  more  generally,  with  what  Lacan  calls  the
         Symbolic, the process of subject constitution is continued. This is
         customarily  formulated  in  relation  to  the f o rt-da  game.  Freud





                              Copyrighted Material
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111