Page 164 - Design for Environment A Guide to Sustainable Product Development
P. 164

Design Rules and Guidelines      143

               Product Simplicity
               Design elegance has long been a desirable attribute of products. For
               example, during the 1930s, the Bauhaus school of design formalized
               its criteria of elegance in terms of minimalism and functional orien-
               tation. With the advent of environmental consciousness, elegance
               in the form of simplicity has acquired a strong added motivation.
               Simplicity usually leads to lower manufacturing cost, lower mate-
               rial mass, greater durability, and easier disassembly for purposes
               of maintenance or asset recovery. There are several ways in which
               designers can try to achieve greater simplicity:

                    • Reducing the complexity of the product enclosures and
                      assemblies in terms of their geometric and spatial design, as
                      well as their functional operation.
                    • Reducing the number of distinct parts that are incorporated
                      into a design; this is a well-known technique in the field of
                      design for manufacture and assembly.
                    • Designing multifunctional parts that serve a variety of dif-
                      ferent purposes; e.g., using a single type of fastener for all
                      assemblies.
                    • Utilizing common parts in a number of different designs, rep-
                      resenting either different models in a product family or suc-
                      cessive product generations.
                    • Using fewer different types of materials, which tends to lower
                      costs by facilitating processes associated with procurement,
                      manufacturing, and disassembly. Designing with fewer mate-
                      rials both facilitates identification and results in larger
                      volumes of each material, potentially increasing the sal-
                      vage value that can be obtained (see Section C.3, Design for
                      Recyclability).

               Disassembly Sequencing
               The extent to which a unit, module, assembly, or component should
               be disassembled depends not only on the costs of disassembly, sepa-
               ration, inspection, sorting, and refurbishment, but also on the reuse,
               resale or salvage values. For example, it may not be cost-effective to
               disassemble products that contain many different, difficult to identify
               materials. Similarly, if components, assemblies and modules cannot
               be reused or refurbished, and if they contain largely nonrecyclable
               materials, little disassembly is warranted.
                   The sequence of assembly and the extent to which a product is
               disassembled can be represented hierarchically by a disassembly tree, as
               shown in Figure 8.7, which identifies all major modules and compo-
               nents in the product. There are a sequence of choices in order of prior-
               ity to be made at each step in the sequence—reuse as is, refurbish and
               resell, disassemble, shred and recycle, or simply dispose of as waste.
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169