Page 216 - Design for Environment A Guide to Sustainable Product Development
P. 216

Analysis Methods for Design Decisions      193

               Heat Transfer Process Design
               This second DFE example applies similar concepts to the design of a
               process in a manufacturing facility. A company is reviewing options
               for replacing heat transfer fluids that are used in injection molding
               applications. Currently, heat transfer fluids are purchased on the
               basis of the requirements of the application, product availability,
               and initial purchase cost. Worker concerns about adverse health
               impacts, recent product price increases, and the availability of sev-
               eral new products have motivated the company to reevaluate the
               heat transfer fluids used in the manufacturing process. In selecting
               a heat transfer fluid, the company has the following goals:
                    • Minimize the total life-cycle costs,
                    • Decrease the volume of heat transfer fluids that are inciner-
                      ated or landfilled, and
                    • Reduce adverse impacts to worker health.

                   Heat transfer fluids typically have different purchase costs, dis-
               posal costs, and useful lives. In addition, because of fundamental
               differences in their physical and chemical characteristics, the operat-
               ing and maintenance costs (e.g., inspection costs, system repair costs,
               and worker training costs) can also differ.
                   Table 9.5 illustrates an analysis of several alternative types of
               fluid. While perfluorinated fluids are more costly initially, they have
               a longer expected lifetime (35 years), lower operating and mainte-
               nance costs, and much lower disposal costs (since they are recycla-
               ble) than other alternatives. These lower costs more than make up
               for the initial capital costs incurred to modify the heat exchangers.
               This life-cycle cost perspective shows that, on an annualized basis,
               perfluorinated fluids have significantly lower costs.
                   There are environmental benefits as well. Because perfluori-
               nated fluids can be recycled, their use virtually eliminates the need
               to landfill or incinerate spent material. Furthermore, they are inert,



                            Capital and  Operating &              Annual
                            Acquisition  Maintenance  Disposal  Life-Cycle  Cost
                            Costs     Costs      Costs   Costs    (NPV)

                Mineral Oil    $275     $4,531    $130    $4,936  $3,705
                Aromatic       $750     $6,023    $113    $6,886  $2,769
                Hydrocarbon
                Perfluorinated   $18,500  $4,344    $1   $22,845  $2,369
                Fluid

               TABLE 9.5  Comparison of Alternative Heat Transfer Fluids
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221