Page 287 - Design for Environment A Guide to Sustainable Product Development
P. 287

Chemical Industries     263

               help identify products and processes that consume less energy and
               generate less waste and emissions than alternatives, while maintain-
               ing or improving the products’ commercial value [8]. The tool has
               been applied to over 100 different products and processes, such as
               asphalt microsurfacing, nylon fiber, building materials, automotive
               coatings, plastics, and adhesives. For example, BASF’s eco-efficiency
               analysis for dyeing of blue denim revealed that electrochemical appli-
               cation of a vat solution was preferable to the use of powdered, granu-
               lar, or biotechnologically produced indigo.
                   Recently, BASF has expanded the scope of its analysis to consider
               the three dimensions of sustainability—economy, environment, and
                                                   ®
               society. The company’s new SEEbalance  tool (SocioEcoEfficiency
               Analysis) enables integrated assessment not only of environmental
               impacts and costs but also of the societal impacts of products and
               processes (see Figure 13.4). The societal impacts are grouped into five
               stakeholder categories: employees, international community, future
               generations, consumers, and local and national community. For each
               of these stakeholder categories measurable indicators are considered,
               such as number of occupational accidents, and these are summarized
               in the form of a “social fingerprint.”


          References
                 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008 Sector Performance Report.
                 2. P. Anastas and J. Warner, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford
                  University Press, 1998).
                 3. More information about Dow Chemical’s sustainability commitments is avail-
                  able at www.dow.com/commitments/.
                 4. T. C. Sparks, G. D. Crouse, J. E. Dripps, P. Anzeveno, J. Martynow, C. V. DeAmicis,
                  and J. Gifford, “Neural network-based QSAR and insecticide discovery:
                  spinetoram,” Journal of Computer Aided Molecular Design, 2008.
                 5. N. Su and R. H. Scheffrahn, “A review of subterranean termite practices and
                  prospects for integrated pest management programmes,” Integrated Pest
                  Management Reviews, 1998.
                 6. More information about DuPont’s sustainability programs is available at
                  www2.dupont.com/Sustainability/en_US/.
                 7. More information about BASF’s sustainability programs is available at www.
                  basf.com/group/sustainability_en/index.
                 8. P. Saling, A. Kicherer, B. Dittrich-Krämer, R. Wittlinger, W. Zombik, I. Schmidt,
                  W. Schrott and S. Schmidt, “Eco-Efficiency Analysis by BASF: The Method,”
                  International Journal of Life Cycle Analysis, 2002.
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292