Page 122 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 122

Product Development Process and Design for Six Sigma  97



                                             Y=f(x)
                                Matrix A
              CAs         FRs          DPs          PVs
               •            •            •           •
               •            •            •           •
               •            •            •           •
                                 Y=f(x)      Matrix B
                            Physical mapping    Process mapping
           Figure 3.17 The design mappings.




           coupled design is badly needed, especially when the effect of sources of
           variation are anticipated to have a detrimental effect on the FRs.
             The design process involves three mappings between four domains
           (Fig. 3.17). The first mapping involves the mapping between customer
           attributes (CAs) and functional requirements (FRs). This mapping is
           very critical as it yields the high-level minimum set of functional
           requirements needed to accomplish the design objective from the cus-
           tomer perspective. It can be performed by the means of quality func-
           tion deployment (QFD). Once the minimum set of FRs are defined, the
           physical mapping  (matrix A) starts. This mapping involves the FR
           domain and the design parameter (DP) domain. It represents the
           development activities and can be represented by design matrices as
           the high-level set of FRs cascade down to the lowest level of decompo-
           sition. The collection of design matrices forms the conceptual functional
           structure that reveals coupling and provides a means to track the prop-
           agation of design changes for if-then scenario analysis.
             The process mapping (matrix B) is the last mapping and involves the
           DP domain and the process variables (PV) domains. This mapping can
           be represented by matrices as is the case with the physical mapping
           and provides the process structure needed to translate the DPs to
           process variables.

           3.9 Differences between Six Sigma
           and DFSS
           In a design assignment or a problem-solving assignment, whether the
           black belt is aware or not, design mappings, in terms of matrices A and
           B, do exist (Fig. 3.17). In a DFSS project, the three mappings need to
           be performed sequentially, as the output of one is the input to the next
           mapping. When the last two mappings follow the design axioms, the
           possibility of establishing the Six Sigma capability in the design entity
           is created using conceptual methods. However, the type of project
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127