Page 227 - Design for Six Sigma for Service (Six SIGMA Operational Methods)
P. 227

196   Chapter Eight

          3. Limitation on brand extension: An overly strong association to par-
             ticular product attributes may limit the ability for a brand name to
             extend to other fields. For example, both GM and Ford have strong
             financial arms, and they make a profit out of them. However, they are
             mostly automobile-related financial operations. Because of the over-
             whelming brand association with the auto industry, if would be hard for
             them to stretch into non-auto-related financial operations in a big way.
          4. Limitation on business strategy change: An overly strong association
             to particular product attributes will limit a brand’s ability to respond to
             changing markets. The Atkins brand is closely associated with the
             Atkins diet theory. It is doing fine today. However, if the Atkins diet
             theory becomes out of favor, this brand will have a big problem.

        Therefore, it is important for a brand name to address other perspectives of
        brand identity.


        The Brand as Organization
        The brand as organization perspective focuses on attributes of the organization
        rather than on those of the product or service. Such organizational attributes as
        innovation, a drive to quality, and concern for the environment are created by
        the people, culture, values, and programs of the company. Some organization-
        related attributes can also be related to product; for example, innovation and
        quality could also be related to product design. However, when these attributes
        are related to the organization, they usually mean different things such as
        culture and values. For example, Toyota’s lean manufacturing principles are
        easy to copy from a procedural point of view; however, it is Toyota’s culture
        that is really difficult to imitate. And this is why so many companies want to
        implement lean manufacturing but fail to reach its full benefits (Liker 2004).

        Organizational attributes are more enduring and more resistant to com-
        petitive claims than are product attributes. First, it is much easier to copy a
        product than to duplicate an organization with unique people, values, and
        culture. Second, organizational attributes usually apply to a set of product
        classes, and a competitor with a single product class is difficult to match.
        Third, the organizational attributes such as an innovative and quality culture
        are difficult to measure and communicate, so it is difficult for a competitor
        to convince consumers that it has closed a conceived gap.

        The Brand as Person
        The brand as person perspective suggests a brand identity that is richer and
        more interesting than one based on product attributes. Like a person, a brand
        can be perceived as being upscale, competent, impressive, trustworthy, fun,
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232