Page 351 - Design of Simple and Robust Process Plants
P. 351

8.4 Control Design  337
                Table 8.5. Losses of distillation for different selected control variables at different disturbances
                (Skogestad, 1999) (Nominal profit $ 4.528/min).

                Controlled  x B = 0.04 D/F = 0.639 R = 15.065  R/F = 15.065 V/F = 15.704 R/D = 23.57
                variable ®
                Disturbances
                ¯
                Nominal    0.0    0.0       0.0      0.0      0.0       0.0
                F = 1.3    0.0    0.0       0.514    0.0      0.0       0.0
                z F = 0.5  0.023  infea     0.000    0.000    0.001     1096
                z F = 0.75  0.019  2.53     0.006    0.006    0.004     0.129
                q F = 0.5  0.000  0.000     0.001    0.001    0.003     0.000
                x D = 0.996  0.086  0.089   0.091    0.091    0.091     0.093
                20% impl.  0.12   infea     0.119    0.119    0.127     0.130
                error of CVs
                Losses in $/min, D, B, F and V flows in kmol/min.;
                z F = feed concentration of lights; q F = vapor fraction of feed;
                p D, B, V = $/kmol.
                Nominal conditions: F = 1.0, z F = 0.65, q F = 1.0, p F =10 p D = 20, p v =
                0.1, x D = 0.995
                20% implementation error on CVs; x D = 0.996; x B = 0.048; D/F = 0.766;
                R = 18.08; R/F = 18.08; V/F = 18.85; R/D = 28.28.




                These selected pairings are subject for evaluation after the interaction analysis, see
                below. After the selection of the final pairing for quality control, the pairing for the
                inventory control can easily be deduced. For details of the method and the conclu-
                sions, see Skogestad et al. (1999).
                  The methodology for selection of controlled variables based on a self-optimizing
                control approach, is performed by analysis of steady-state simulations. The metho-
                dology which is generically applicable for units follows the following sequential
                steps:

                  1.  Determine the degrees of freedom available for optimization of the unit.
                  2.  Define the optimization problem as a cost or profit problem and identify the
                      constraints.
                  3.  Identify the most important disturbances. These can be divided into process
                      disturbances as well as parameter disturbances and implementation errors.
                      Variations in price sets are normally not included. These determine the set
                      points for controlled variables which are submitted periodically from off-line
                      or closed-loop process plant optimizations.
                  4.  Optimization of unit for different disturbances. From these optimizations
                      the nominal optimal values are calculated for all variables, including con-
                      trolled variables of interest.
                  5.  Identify candidate controlled variables.
   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356