Page 443 - Design of Simple and Robust Process Plants
P. 443

430  Chapter 10 The Efficient Design and Continuous Improvement of High-quality Process Plants
                (1999). The final result will be a preliminary mass and energy balance based on the
                consolidated flow diagram.


                Energy optimization
                This is done based on the preliminary mass and energy balance. A pinch study is
                started to determine the energy targets (heating and cooling). This must be done
                within the identified constraints for heat exchange, such as operability, controllabil-
                ity, and safety. Based on these target data, iterations will take place between flow-
                sheet optimization and energy optimization. The final result will be a consolidated
                mass and energy balance, the energy levels are selected and the major equipment
                dimensions fixed, such as number of trays, column diameter, and number of com-
                pressor stages. Next, the energy network can be optimized, resulting in the sizing of
                the heat exchangers.
                  Timing and documentation: conceptual design optimization needs to be done dur-
                ing process synthesis. Optimization of the consolidated flowsheet in interaction
                with energy optimization are planned after the process synthesis, with the exception
                of heat exchanger network optimization, which can be done during basic engineer-
                ing. All the optimization work needs to be documented, especially with its objective
                functions, its price sets, constraints and the degrees of freedom for the optimization
                and its sensitivities.

                 10.3.2.5  Reliability modeling
                This is a fairly young applied design technique   excluding nuclear and aircraft
                industries   to improve process design and to quantify the availability of the pro-
                cess, including its infrastructure (Henley and Kumamoto, 1981&1992), It can gener-
                ate a ranking of the elements contributing to plant unavailability and its down time
                due to mechanical failures.
                  The objective of reliability modeling is based on a quantitative technique; to calcu-
                late plant availability, identification of unreliable components, and to provide a tool
                to optimize the design by the evaluation of design alternatives. The design philoso-
                phy, ªDesign for single components unless, economically or safety wise justifiedº,
                requires reliability modeling to justify any deviation from single components (Koo-
                len, 1998). The design options for consideration are in order of priority:
                  .   Can we eliminate this component?
                  .   In case of failure, does that necessarily end in a process stop, and in case it
                      does not, can a component failure be survived within its repair time?
                  .   Can we replace this component with a more reliable one?
                  .   Consider redundancy
                The technique has been applied both extensively and successfully in the power
                industry, as well as off-shore explorations (Shor and Griffin, 1991).
                  Timing: during the conceptual design and basic engineering phase.
                  Documentation: results have to be documented in a reliability report.
   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448