Page 263 - Design of Solar Thermal Power Plants
P. 263

246              4. DESIGN OF THE CONCENTRATION SYSTEM

            thermal tower power generation systems [34]. The mathematical models
            of MIRVAL, FIAT LUX, and SolTrace can be used only for detailed he-
            liostat field energy collection calculations and not for heliostat field
            optimization. The mathematical models of HFLCAL and DELSOL,
            however, can be used for the entire solar thermal tower power generation
            system, including heliostat field optimization design; they can be directly
            used for estimating the annual average optical performance of a large-
            scale heliostat field; but for small-scale heliostat fields, their calculation
            accuracies are comparatively low [34]. The main features of the above
            performance-analysis programs are shown in Table 4.2 [34].
               From 2003 to 2005, SENER Corp. of Spain successfully developed
            SENSOL software [35], which was written in Fortran and used for thermal
            economic analysis of solar thermal tower power generation systems. The
            coordinate position of the heliostat can be determined based on the level
            of economy. This software was applied in the system design of the Solar
            Tres program in Spain.
               The main heliostat field design codes in china include HFLD and HOC.
               Several main heliostat field design codes are compared in Table 4.2.

            4.3.2.2 Basic Idea of Concentrating Field Design
               The basic idea is to apply a radial-staggered layout pattern, conduct
            heliostat field layout optimization for a solar thermal tower power
            generation system using conventional dual-axis tracking under the
            premise of avoiding mechanical collision between adjacent heliostats
            while collecting maximum energy or achieving optimal economy, as well
            as optimizing results to obtain a Pareto curve under dual-objective
            coordinate axes that consist of various optimal heliostat field layout
            schemes. The optimized heliostat field features not only a low-unit energy
            cost and good economy, but also uniform and reasonable energy
            distributions.
            1. Required space for heliostat free rotation [13]: a heliostat is by
               nature a mirror (reflective mirror). Conventionally, a rectangular
               heliostat rotating around a fixed vertical axis, which has been the
               most widely used as shown in Fig. 4.15, continually tracks
               variations in solar position in order to reflect solar radiation onto
               the fixed target of the receiver. Because the diameter of the vertically
               placed barrel-shaped cylinder created by its free rotation around
               the azimuth axis is equal to the length of the heliostat’s diagonal,
               during heliostat field design, feature parameter D m is defined as the
               length of the diagonal plus a safety clearance of 0.3 m. During the
               placement of heliostats, the spacing between two heliostats must
               not be less than this value.
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268