Page 10 - Living Room WarsDesprately Seeking the Audience Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World
P. 10

Preface and acknowledgements



        In the autumn of 1986 in New York, I had an informal lunch meeting with Jo Holz, then a
        researcher for the News Department of National Broadcasting Company (NBC), one of
        the three major networks of American commercial television. I was interested in how
        people inside the television industry look at the television audience, and we were talking
        about the kind of research in which she and her colleagues were  engaged.  She  said
        earnestly  and  straightforwardly  that,  without  doubt, all the research they do is in the
        interest of ‘delivering audiences to  the  advertisers’. I was accustomed to hearing this
        expression  being  used  in an ironical, if not cynical fashion by critical scholars and
        journalists who wanted to stress the perversity of the objectifying, commodifying logic
        that governs commercial television. But Holz made it clear that there’s nothing ironical
        about it within the industry. Irony  is  an  unfit attitude in an enterprise whose very
        economic base depends upon its success in ‘delivering audiences to advertisers’. Industry
        people take this task very seriously—and for granted. This illustrates the importance of
        institutional setting in shaping the way in which the audience is perceived and assessed,
        problematized and conceived. ‘In fact’, Holz continued, giving a new twist  to  our
        conversation, ‘industry people are much more inclined to see the audience as active than
        critics who worry so much about the effects of television from an outside perspective. We
        just can’t afford to sit back and think of the audience as  a  passive  bunch  that  takes
        anything they’re served.’ I found her remarks to be an insightful account of institutional
        self-consciousness. Her observations point to the argument that I will make in this book:
        that despite television’s apparently steady success in absorbing people’s attention,
        television  audiences remain extremely difficult to define, attract and keep. The
        institutions must forever ‘desperately seek the audience’.
           This book’s main purpose is to deconstruct this process of ‘desperately seeking the
        audience’ by rearticulating and contextualizing institutional discourses on the television
        audience so that they are robbed of their naturalness—so that the irony is put back in, as
        it were. It turns out that the audience so desperately sought does not exist, at least not in
        the unified and controllable mode in which it is generally envisioned.
           But there were also other reasons for writing this book. First, having been interested as
        a researcher into the cultural details of how people deal with popular television in the
        realm of everyday life—details that generally remain private and discreet—I wanted to
        examine how this realm was accounted for, or rather accounted away, by those ‘on the
        other side’: the television professionals. Furthermore, I wanted to compare  different,
        ostensibly contradictory institutional arrangements of television broadcasting—American
        style commercial television and West-European style public  service  broadcasting—
        because I believe that such a juxtaposition  can highlight some general strategies of
        ‘desperately seeking the audience’ that  remain  unexplored when the systems are
        considered separately. It is in the common practice of audience measurement that those
        strategies are most clearly  revealed.  The  comparative perspective offered here can
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15