Page 141 -
P. 141

have Cauchy’s steepest ascent. If f is concave
                                                           and one chooses H equal to the negative of the
                                                           inverse Hessian, we have the modified Newton’s
                                 V                         method.

                                                           variable upper bound (VUB)   A constraint
                                                           of the form: x ≤ x .
                                                                       i
                                                                           j
                  valid inequality  An inequality constraint
                                                           variational calculus  An approach to solv-
                  added to a relaxation that is redundant in the ori-
                                                           ing a class of optimization problems that seek a
                  ginal mathematical program. An example is a  functional(y)tomakesomeintegralfunction(J)
                  linear form, ax ≤ b, used as a cutting plane in  an extreme. Given F in C , the classical uncon-
                                                                                1
                  the LP relaxation of an integer program.  strained problem is to find y in C to minimize
                                                                                       1
                    A linear form that is a facet of the integer poly-  (or maximize) the following function:
                  hedron.

                                                                            x 1

                                                                   J(y) =     F(x, y, y )dx.
                  value iteration  This is an algorithm for                x 0
                  infinite horizon [stochastic] dynamic programs  An example is to minimize arc length, where

                  that proceeds by successive approximation to sat-     2

                                                           F =     (1 + y ). Using the Euler-Lagrange
                  isfy the fundamental equation
                                                           equation, the solution is y(x) = ax + b, where
                                                           a and b are determined by boundary conditions:


                  F(s) = Opt {r(x, s)+a    P(x, s, s )F(s )},
                                                              0
                                                                           1
                                        s                  y(x ) = y and y(x ) = y .
                                                                                1
                                                                   0

                                                              If constraints take the form G(x,y,y ) = 0,
                  where a is a discount rate. The successive  this is called the problem of Lagrange; other
                  approximation becomes the DP forward equa-  forms are possible.
                  tion. If 0 <a < 1, this is a fixed point, and
                  Banach’s theorem yields convergence because  variational crime  Consider a linear vari-
                  then “Opt” is a contraction map. Even when  ational problem a(u, v) = f (v), v ∈ V, f ∈
                  thereisnodiscounting, policyiterationcanapply.  V ,a : V × V → C a sesqui-linear form, V a

                                                           Banach space. In two ways a discretization based
                                                           on a finite element space V can go beyond the
                                                                                 h
                  value (of a quantity)  Magnitude of a particu-
                                                           usual Galerkin framework:
                  lar quantity generally expressed as a unit of mea-
                  surement multiplied by a number.            (i.) The sesquilinear form a and the linear
                                                           form f may be replaced with mesh-dependent
                                                           approximations a : V × V → C and f :
                                                                                               h
                                                                              h
                                                                                   h
                                                                          h
                  variablemetricmethod   Originallyreferred
                                                           V h  → C. This happens, for instance, when
                  to as the Davidon-Fletcher-Powell (DFP)
                                                           numerical quadrature is employed for the eval-
                  method, this is a family of methods that
                                                           uation of integrals.
                  choose the direction vector in unconstrained
                                                             (ii.) The finite element space V might be
                                                                                        h
                  optimization by the subproblem:  d  ∗  in
                                                           non-conforming with respect to V , that is
                  argmax {gradf(x)d :  d = 1}, where  d
                                                           V  ⊂ V .
                                                             h
                  is the vector norm (or metric) defined by the

                  quadratic form, d Hd.  With H symmetric  Whether these variational crimes still lead to a

                  and positive definite, the constraint d Hd = 1  meaningful discrete problem can be checked by
                  restricts d by being on a circle, i.e., equidistant  means of Strang’s lemmas.
                  from a stationary point, called the center (the ori-
                                                                                                n
                  gin in this case). By varying H, as in the DFP  variational inequality  Let F : X → R .
                  update, to capture the curvature of the objective  The variational inequality problem is to find x
                  function, f , we have a family of ascent algo-  in X such that F(x)(y − x) ≥ 0 for all y in X.
                  rithms. Besides DFP, if one chooses H = I,we  This includes the complementarity problem.
                  c
           © 2003 by CRC Press LLC
           © 2003 by CRC Press LLC
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146