Page 108 - Digital Analysis of Remotely Sensed Imagery
P. 108

Overview of Remotely Sensed Data       79

               2.8.1  Identification of User Needs
               Different users purchase remote sensing data for different purposes
               and needs. Before deciding what type of data to purchase, the analyst
               needs to identify the special requirements by answering the following
               questions:

                    •  First, what type of data is the most useful for studying the
                      phenomenon in question? Is it optical or microwave? If
                      optical, should the data be recorded in visible light, NIR,
                      middle infrared, far infrared, or their combination? Optical
                      data are the best at studying in-water constituents, while
                      near and middle infrared imagery is especially good at
                      studying vegetation. TIR imagery is effective at revealing
                      heat-related phenomena, but suffers from a lack of detail
                      and coarse spectral resolution. Microwave imagery is
                      excellent at detecting hidden features and at ocean
                      applications. It is the only remote sensing functioning in
                      tropical areas where the ground area is frequently obstructed
                      by clouds. Radar imagery suffers from a lack of spectral
                      resolution and radiometric noises. For most natural
                      resources mapping and environmental monitoring, the best
                      choice is multispectral data over the visible and NIR portion
                      of the spectrum.
                    •  Second, what detail level is required? The amount of details
                      to be identified from remote sensing imagery is related
                      directly to its spatial resolution and scale. Images of varying
                      spatial resolutions enable different information to be derived
                      from them at different accuracy levels. Images of a finer
                      spatial resolution allow more details to be discerned, but they
                      may cover only a small strip of the area under study. Thus, a
                      large number of images have to be acquired to completely
                      cover the area.  Another implication of using fine spatial
                      resolution images is the long time and huge cost necessary to
                      process them. Besides, data of a finer spatial resolution are
                      more expensive than those of a coarser resolution, so it is
                      important to select images at the right spatial resolution. In
                      deciding which image is the best for the task, users need to
                      base the decision on their special needs. It may not bring
                      much benefit if detailed information is not required. Apart
                      from the amount of details visible, spatial resolution or pixel
                      size also affects the reliability of the results derived from the
                      data. Covering a local area, images of a finer spatial resolution
                      are suited to applications of a small area as the mapping
                      accuracy requirements are stringent. The expected accuracy
                      standard can be met more easily with the use of images of a
                      finer spatial resolution. Coarser resolution data are more
                      appropriate for broad-scale applications. Geometric accuracy
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113