Page 212 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 212

8. UNDERSTANDING HETEROSEXISM
 out to no one at work, 37% were out to some people, 24% were out to most
 people, and 27% reported that they were out to everyone at work (Ragins
 & Cornwell, 2001 a). Coming out to some coworkers, but not all, can create
 considerable ambiguity as to "who knows and who does not."   181
 Research on the work and individual outcomes associated with disclo­
 sure yields inconsistent findings. Some researchers found that gay and
 lesbian employees who disclosed their sexual orientation to more people
 at work had less general anxiety (Jordan & Deluty, 1998), greater job satis­
 faction, and less job anxiety (Griffith & Hebl, 2002) than those who did not
 disclose. However, other researchers found no relationship between dis­
 closure and work attitudes, psychological strain, or occupational coping
 (Croteau & Lark, 1995; Driscoll, Kelley, & Fassinger, 1996). In fact, some
 studies found that gay and lesbian employees who disclosed to more peo­
 ple at work had lower continuance organizational commitment (Day &
 Schoenrade, 1997), earned less compensation (Ellis & Riggle, 1995; Schnei­
 der, 1987), and had less pay satisfaction (Ellis & Riggle, 1995) than those
 who concealed their sexual identity from others in the workplace. One
 reason for these inconsistent findings may be that the actual decision to
 disclose at work, although important and complex, has less of an im­
 pact than the immediate fears preceding this decision. In fact, Ragins and
 Cornwell (2001 b) found that the fear of negative consequences of disclo­
 sure had a greater impact on work attitudes and psychological strain than
 the actual disclosure decision, which brought a sense of relief to gay and
 lesbian employees. This suggests that the organization's climate is a key
 factor to consider when examining outcomes associated with disclosure;
 staying in the closet may be an optimal survival strategy for gay and les­
 bian employees in hostile organizational climates. However, when gay and
 lesbian workers feel free to "be their true selves" in the workplace, the orga­
 nization may also benefit. For example, Creed and Scully (2000) observed
 that disclosure of a gay or lesbian identity in the workplace is a tool for
 positive change, as it can heighten others' awareness of the potential for
 heterosexism and discrimination.

 Support for Identity

 Gay and lesbian employees get little support in managing their sexual
 identities, and the coming out process is usually a difficult and isolating
 experience (c.f. Garnets & Kimmel, 1993; Rivers, 1997). Because families
 of lesbians and gay men are typically heterosexual, they often cannot pro­
 vide adult gay children with role models or coping mechanisms to address
 heterosexism. Whereas the family unit is a source of support for many peo­
 ple of color, families are often disrupted, and even lost, when adult gay
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217