Page 210 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 210

8. UNDERSTANDING HETEROSEXISM
                                                 179
 Recognizing these limitations, researchers began to define sexual ori­
 entation more precisely (Coleman, 1987; Garnets & Kimmel, 1993). Three
 main distinctions emerged. First, instead of viewing sexual orientation as a
 single dimension, sexual orientation was viewed as falling along two con­
 tinuous scales of homosexuality and heterosexuality. This view allowed
 for a more accurate assessment of bisexuals (i.e., those with high scores
 on both the heterosexual and homosexual dimensions) and also addressed
 the construct of asexuality (i.e., those with low scores on both dimensions.)
 Second, a distinction was made between behavioral preference, based on
 physical actions, and affectional preference, based on feelings and emo­
 tions (Shively & DeCecco, 1977). This distinction allowed for the scenario
 in which an individual is physically attracted to one sex, but emotionally
 attracted to another. Third, sexual identity was conceptualized as involving
 four factors: (a) biological sex; (b) gender identity, which is the individual's
 sense of being male or female; (c) social sex role, which involves the display
 of characteristics that are culturally stereotyped as masculine or feminine,
 and (d) sexual orientation, which involves both behavioral and affectional
 dimensions. These four components may not be congruent. For example,
 a biological woman with a male gender identity may be in a same-gender
 relationship but self-identity as heterosexual because of her gender iden­
 tity.

 Heterosexism and Homophobia

 Heterosexuals' negative attitudes toward gay men and lesbians have been
 given a number of different names. In 1972, Weinberg coined the phrase
 homophobia to describe the dread of being in close quarters with gay men
 (Weinberg, 1972). Although this term was intended to capture the per­
 sonal discomfort and fear, often at phobic levels, that some heterosexuals
 feel when associating with gay men and lesbians (Herek, 1984), it is often
 inappropriately used to describe all negative attitudes toward lesbians and
 gay men (Logan, 1996). Phobic reactions include emotional responses of
 anger and anxiety that are not typically present in prejudice toward les­
 bians and gays (Berkman & Zinberg, 1997). Indeed, overusing the term
 homophobia, as is done when all prejudice toward lesbians and gays is
 described in this manner, may be counterproductive in that true cases of
 homophobia could be left untreated (Haaga, 1991).
 Research suggests that most prejudiced reactions to lesbians and gays
 are best conceived of as just that—prejudice—rather than phobias (Logan,
 1996). A more appropriate term to describe negative attitudes toward gays
 and lesbians is heterosexism. This term reflects the belief that heterosexu­
 ality is the only legitimate sexual orientation, such that alternatives to it
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215