Page 205 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases

174
CLEVELAND, VESCIO, BARNES-FARRELL
Glick, P., Diebold, ]., Bailey-Warner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent
sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
23,1323-1334.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostil and
benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,481-512.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2002). Ambivalent Responses. American Psychologist, 57,444-446.
Goldin, C. (2002). The rising and then declining significance of gender. Working paper 8915,
Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Graves, L. (1999). Gender bias in interviewers evaluations of applicants. In G. Powell (Ed.),
Handbook of gender and work (pp. 145-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Greenhaus, J., & Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research on work, family and gender: Current status
and guture directions. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 391-412).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Heilman, M. E. (1984). Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: the effects of
applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 33,174-186.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover,
productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38,
635-672.
Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic management
effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40,
171-188.
Katz, L, & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational
and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
55, 7893-7905.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and re­
sponses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82,965-990.
Keltner, C., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psy­
chological Review, 110,265-284.
Kessler-Harris, A. (1985). The debate over equality for women in the workplace: Recognizing
differences. In L. Larwood, A. Stromberg, & B. Gutek (Eds.), Women and work: An annual
review (Vol. 1, pp 141-161). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lewis, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1999). The work-family research agenda in changing contexts.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 382-393.
Lorber, J. (1986). Dismantling Noah's Ark. Sex Roles, 14, 567-580.
Lorber, J. (1992). Gender. In Edgar F. Borgatta & Marie L. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of
Sociology, 2, 748-765. NY: Macmillan.
Loy, P. H., & Stewart, L. P. (1984). The extent and effects of the sexual harassment of working
women. Sociological Focus, 17,31-43.
Martell, R. F, Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male-female differences: A computer simula­
tion. American Psychologist, 51,157-158.
Martin, P., & Harkreader, S. (1993). Multiple gender contexts and employee rewards. Work
and Occupations, 20,296-336.
McCall, L. (2001). Complex inequality: Gender, class and race in the new economy. New York:
Routledge.
McConahay, J. B., Hardee, B. B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends
on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 563-579.
Mellor, S., Barnes-Farrell, J., & Stanton, J. (1999). Unions as justice-promoting organizations:
The interactive effect of ethnicity, gender, and perceived union effectiveness. Sex Roles, 40,
331-346.