Page 256 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 256
9. AGE DISCRIMINATION
223
Kirchner, W. K., & Dunnette, M. D. (1954). Attitudes towards older workers. Personnel Psy
chology, 7, 257-265.
Kirchner, W. K., Lindbom, T., & Paterson, D. G. (1952). Attitudes toward the employment of
older people. Personnel Psychology, 36,154-156.
Kulik, C. T., Perry, E. L., & Bourhis, A. C. (2000). Ironic evaluation processes: Effects of thought
suppression on evaluations of older job applicants. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21,
689-711.
Landy, F. J., Shankster-Cawley, L., & Moran, S. K. (1995). Advancing personnel selection and
placement methods. In A. Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 252-289). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lawrence, B. S. (1984). Age grading: The implicit organizational timetable. Journal of Occupa
tional Behavior, 13,181-191.
Lawrence, B. S. (1987). An organizational theory of age effects. In S. Bacharach & N. DiTomaso
(Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 5, pp. 37-71). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Lawrence, B. S. (1988). New wrinkles in the theory of age: Demography, norms, and perfor
mance ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 31,309-337.
Lawrence, B. S. (1990). At the crossroads: A multiple-level explanation of individual attach
ment. Organization Science, 1,65-85.
Lemyre, L., & Smith, P. M. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal
group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49,660-670.
Liden, R. C., Stilwell, D., & Ferris, G. R. (1996). The effects of supervisor and subordinate
age on objective performance and subjective performance ratings. Human Relations, 49,
327-347.
Marks v. Loral Corporation, 57 Cal. App. 4th 30 (1997).
Martocchio, J. J. (1989). Age-related differences in employee absenteeism: A meta-analysis.
Psychology and Aging, 4,409-414.
Martocchio, J. J. (1993). Employee decisions to enroll in microcomputer training. Human Re
source Development Quarterly, 4, 51-69.
Maurer, T. J. (2001). Career-relevant learning and development, worker age, and beliefs about
self-efficacy for development. Journal of Management, 27,123-140.
Maurer, T. J. & Barbeite, F. G. (2001). Job performance and the aging worker. In D. Ekerdt
(Ed.), Encyclopedia of aging. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
Maurer, T. J., & Rafuse, N. E. (2001). Learning, not litigating: Managing employee development
and avoiding claims of age discrimination. Academy of Management Executive, 15,110-121.
Maurer, T. J., Wrenn, K. A., & Weiss, E. M. (2001). Toward understanding and managing stereotyp
ical beliefs about older worker's ability and desire for learning and development. Paper presented
at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington DC.
McEvoy, G. M., & Cascio, W. F. (1989). Cumulative evidence of the relationship between
employee age and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74,11-17.
McCann, R., & Giles, H. (2002). Ageism in the workplace: A communication perspective.
In T. Nelson (ed). Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 163-199).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meisenheimer, J. R., & lig, R. E. (2000). Looking for a 'better' job: Job-search activity of the
employed. Monthly Labor Review, September 2000,3-14.
Miller, C. S., Kaspin, J. A., & Schuster, M. H. (1990). The impact of performance appraisal
methods on age discrimination in Employment Act cases. Personnel Psychology, 29, 11
27.
Mitchell v. Sisters of Charity of Incarnate Word, 924 F. Supp. 793 (1996).
Musswiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and conse
quences. Psychological Review, 110,472-489.
