Page 89 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 89
59
3. RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY
Flynn, F.J., Chatman, J. A., & Spataro, S. E. (2001). Getting to know you: The influence
of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in
organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 414 142.
Foley, S., & Kidder, D. L. (2002). Hispanic law students' perceptions of discrimination, justice,
and career prospects. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 23-37.
Golightly, C., Huffman, D. M, & Byrne, D. (1972). Liking and loaning. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 56, 521-523.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360
1380.
Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V.
Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105-130). Beverly Hills,
CA: Sage.
Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., & Tsui, A. (1996). Reactions to perceived sex discrimination. Human
Relations, 49, 791-813.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and
the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Man
agement Journal, 41, 96-107.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams and task per
formance: Changing effects of surface- and deep- level diversity on group functioning.
Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.
Hinds, P. J., Carley, K. M., Krackhardt, D., & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing work group mem
bers: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 81, 226-251.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organi
zational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks.
Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
Jackson, P. B., Thoits, P. A., & Taylor, H. F. (1995). Composition of the workplace and psy
chological well-being: The effects of tokenism on America's Black elite. Social Forces, 74,
543-557.
Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. E, Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some
differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as corre
lates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational
diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A
field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Katz, R. (1982). Project communication and performance: An investigation into the effects of
group longevity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 81-104.
Kirchmeyer, C. (1995). Demographic similarity to the work group: A longitudinal study of
managers at the early career stage. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 67-83.
Kirchmeyer, C., & Cohen, A. (1992). Multicultural groups: Their performance and reactions
with constructive conflict. Group and Organization Management, 17, 153-170.
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The composi
tional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325-340.
Lazarsfeld, P. E, & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and
methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in
modern society. New York: Van Nostrand.
