Page 173 - Drilling Technology in Nontechnical Language
P. 173

164             Drilling Technology in Nontechnical Language Second Edition






                  Air may be injected at an appropriate rate in proportion to the mud
              circulation rate. Generally, the technique is limited to a maximum depth of
              about 2,800 ft, as injection pressures become excessive at greater depths.

                  In a foam mud, the liquid is a continuous phase and contains encapsulated
              air bubbles within it. The percentage of liquid will vary between 2% and
              15% by volume.
                  The lifting capacity of stable foam is superior to that of drilling muds;

              cuttings are circulated out of the well more efficiently with foam. It is

              possible to displace fluids from the hole using foam. Oil and saltwater

              influxes are likely to destroy the foam stability, precluding the use of foam
              in those conditions.


                            Designing the Drilling Fluid


                  In selecting the most suitable type of drilling fluid, many different
              factors must be considered. Overall what is required is a mud system
              that gives the lowest overall cost of drilling each hole section, except for

              through the reservoir. The direct cost of the fluid itself (the cost per barrel
              of mud) is but one component of this overall cost. If serious hole problems
              occur because the mud was not optimized for the formations in an effort to
              “save money,” obviously much more money will be spent than would have
              been saved on the mud bill.
                  When drilling through the reservoir, the key is to minimize damaging
              reactions between the mud and the reservoir that lower the production
              possible from the well. If a well loses only 10% of its potential production
              rate due to avoidable damage from the mud, the cost to the operator in lost

              profit over the full life of the well will be large.
                  Mud cost must be considered but only to choose between technically
              suitable  systems.  Therefore  what  should  happen  is  that  for  each  hole
              system, all technically suitable alternatives should be defined and then the


              cost of each can be compared for a final choice.

                  Physical, rheological, and chemical characteristics can be defined for
              each hole section, leading to a list of requirements for the mud system
              of choice.










         _Devereux_Book.indb   164                                                 1/16/12   2:09 PM
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178