Page 200 - Drilling Technology in Nontechnical Language
P. 200

Chapter 8 – DIRECTIONAL AND HORIZONTAL DRILLING                  191






                        ▪ N/S coordinate = 6.54 ft
                    As would be  expected,  the  vertical depth  is now slightly less  than
                 the depth along the hole, and there is a small displacement of the well to
                 the north.
                    Survey 3 is at 750 ft depth. Inclination is now 5° and azimuth is 020°.
                 The well has built some angle and has turned slightly towards the east. The
                 calculated position of this survey point is given as follows:

                        ▪ MD = 750 ft
                        ▪ TVD = 749.28 ft
                        ▪ E/W coordinate = 3.73 ft
                        ▪ N/S coordinate = 23.33 ft
                    The assumption behind the calculations is that the well follows a perfect
                 curve between each survey. In reality, this is not the case, and so there is an
                 error between each survey. This error grows as the well is deepened. This
                 error creates a cone-shaped well path, where the well can be anywhere
                 within the cone. This is called the cone of uncertainty. If two wells are
                 drilled close together and these cones intersect, a possibility of collision
                 arises. The cone does not necessarily have a round shape if cut through,
                 as the instrument that measures inclination has a different accuracy to the
                 instrument measuring the azimuth. Thus the cone would actually have an
                 elliptical cross section.
                    There are ways to reduce this error so that the well path is known more
                 accurately. One way to do this is to take more surveys. This shortens the
                 distance between each survey and so will more closely measure the actual
                 well path. Another way is to use gyro-based tools rather than magnetic-
                 based tools to measure azimuth. In practice, MWD tools are used while
                 drilling a section of hole, then casing is run, and a gyro is run inside the
                 casing to give a corrected (and more accurate) path. Gyros centralized
                 inside casings can take readings while moving at very small intervals and
                 so will give a much more accurate survey than MWD tools, which have
                 magnetic sensors and thus in-built azimuth errors, not all of which can be
                 compensated for. MWD tools run in the open hole will not perfectly align
                 the sensors with the centerline of the wellbore (as a hole is not a perfectly

                 even cylinder of fixed diameter). Thus MWD survey measurements will

                 have a significant error that cannot be compensated for. In an inclined hole,
                 the BHA will sag towards the low side of the hole in between stabilizers,






        _Devereux_Book.indb   191                                                 1/16/12   2:11 PM
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205