Page 228 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 228

200  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries

               Resuspension and redispersion of dust may either occur intentionally, such as by han-
             dling and transport in various process equipment (powder mixers, bucket elevators,
             pneumatic transport, etc.), or unintentionally, by bursting of sacks and bags that contain
             powder, leaks of dust from process equipment, or sudden blasts of air generated by an
             explosion that started elsewhere in the plant.
               The characterizationof the “state” of a dust cloud is far more complicated than char-
             acterizingthe “state” of a premixed quiescentgas mixture. For a quiescentgas, the ther-
             modynamic state is completely defined by the chemical composition, the pressure, and
             the temperature. For a dust cloud, however, the state of equilibrium is complete separa-
             tion, with all the particles settled out at the bottom of the system.
               In the context of dust explosions, the relevant state therefore always is dynamic. In
             various industrial environments as well as in experiments with dust clouds, gravity and
             other inertia forces act on the dust particles, giving rise to a complex dynamic picture.
             In the ideal static dust cloud, all the particles are located in fixed positions, either ordered
             or at random. The closest approximation to the ideal dust cloud that can be encountered
             in practice is probably a cloud in which the particles are settling in quiescent gas under
             the influence of gravity alone.




             3.2
             STRUCTURE OF THE PROBLEM

             Formation of explosible dust clouds from powder deposits implies that particles origi-
             nally in contact in the powder deposit must be separated and distributed in the air to give
             concentrationswithin the explosible range. There are two aspects to consider. The first
             is the spectrum of forces originally acting on and between the particles in the deposit,
             resisting the separation of  the particles. The second aspect is the forces and energy
             required for the separation process under various conditions.
               Eckhoff (1976) suggested that a global dispersibility parameter for a powder deposit
             may be defined by considering these two aspects. A given mass of powder at equilib-
             rium with the ambient atmosphere contains a finite number of interparticlebonds, each
             of which requires a specificamount of work to be broken. The total minimum work W~n
             needed to break all these bonds in one unit mass of powder could, in principle, be calcu-
             lated by integratingthe work required for breaking all the individualinterparticlebonds.
             The influence of gravity would depend on whether the particles have to be raised into
             suspension or whether dispersion is downward. One could then define a theoretical
             upper limit value of the dispersibilityfor that specific powder deposit by








             When defined in this way, the “dispersibility”has the dimension mass per unit of energy
             or work and is therefore a measure of the quantity of powder that can be completely dis-
             persed by spending one unit of energy from external sources in the process. However,
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233