Page 323 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 323

292  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries

            rate, expressed as a function of gas temperature; and h is the heat of reaction. This equa-
            tion implies the calculation of the eigenvalue using the centroid of area expression given
            by Spalding (1957).
              Bradley et al. (1986) assumed that the fuel was essentially premixed gas generated by
            rapid devolatilization of the coal particles and subsequent rapid mixing of the volatiles
            with the air.Furthermore, they assumed that the methane was the essential component of
            the volatiles and the presence of the char particles in the gas phase did not change the gas
            compositionor chemicalkinetics.The radiativeloss from the char particles as they moved
            through the flame was computed. For a chemical heat release rate q per unit surface area
            of a smooth spherical particle, the total energy equation for a particle was taken as


                                                                                   (4.45)


            Here, a is the convective heat transfer coefficient; Tpand Tgare the particle and gas tem-
            peratures; E is the particle emissivity,assumed equal to unity throughout; ois the Stefan-
            Boltzmann constant;v,pp,and h are the particle radius, density, and enthalpy; and tis the
            time. The equation neglects radiative absorption from the walls, gas, and other particles.
              The net heat-release-rate-versus-gas-temperatureprofile was calculatedusing the com-
            prehensive chemical kinetic model for methane/air combustion developed by Dixon-
            Lewis and Islam (1982), correcting for the rate of net energy supply from the particles
            due to their heating by oxidation of the char or graphite.The correction, which was gen-
            erally found to be small compared with the heat release rate from the gas combustion,
            is given by

            H =4m2an(Tp-T,)                                                        (4.46)

            where n is the number density of  particles in the cloud, and the other notations as for
            equation (4.45).
              Figure 4.22 shows a comparison of  burning velocities predicted theoretically by
            Bradley et al. and experimental data from Smoot et al. In general, Bradley et al. found
            that their theory agreed well with experiments as long as devolatilization and gas phase
            mixing were sufficientlyfast and the char did not create a significantheat sink. This was
            found to be satisfied if the particle diameter was <lo pm and the volatile content >25%.
              The basic approach suggestedby Hertzberg et al. (1982,1987)is similar to that of Ballal
            (1983). It was assumed that three sequential processes are involved in the propagation
            of flame through a dust/air mixture:
            1. Heating and devolatilizationof dust particles.
            2. Mixing of the volatiles with air.
            3. Gas phase combustion of the premixed volatiles.

              The characteristictime constants for the three consecutiveprocesses are z,,,z,,   and
            zpm.It was realized that the process of particle heating and devolatilizationis a complex
            combination of conductive,convective, and radiativeheat exchangebetween the burned
            products and the unburned reactants. However, the problem was simplifiedby handling
            those processes implicitly in the laminar burning velocity, S,,  which characterizes the
            overall rate of flame propagation.A laminar flame propagating at S, has an overall reaction
   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328