Page 486 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 486

Sizing of Dust Explosion Vents  453


                retains the dust and flame, thus rendering vent ducts superfluous (see Section 1.4.6 in
                Chapter 1).



                 6.3.2
                 LARGE EMPTY ENCLOSURES OF LID < 4

                As shown in Figure 6.3, a large empty enclosure of volume 500 m3 and LID = 4, in the
                absence of excessivedust cloud turbulence, requires considerably smaller vents thanthose
                specified by VDI 3673 (1979 edition) or NFPA 68 (1988 edition). This also applies to
                the more liberal St 1nomograph for constant-volumepressures P,,,  < 9 bar(g), proposed
                by Bartknecht (1987; not included in Figure 6.3). As shown in Figure 6.12, even more
                dramatic reductions in vent area requirements were found in a 250 m3spherical vessel.
                In this case, the vent area actually needed was only one-eighththat specifiedby VDI 3673
                 (1979 edition).
                  When sizing vents for large enclosures of LlD 5 4, the exact vent area reduction factor
                as compared with VDI 3673 (1979 edition),has to be decided in each case, but it should
                certainly not be greater than 0.5. In some cases, it may be as small as 0.2-0.1.


                 6.3.3
                 LARGE, SLENDER ENCLOSURES (SILOS) OF LID > 4

                The only investigation of vented dust explosions in vertical silos of LID > 4 and volumes
                >I00 m3that has been traced is that described in Section 6.2.2. The strong influence of
                the location of the ignition source on the explosion violence, as illustrated in Figure 6.9,
                is a major problem. It is necessary, in each specific case, to analyze carefully what kind
                of ignition sources are likely to occur and what locations within the silo volume igni-
                tion have a significant probability (Eckhoff, 1987).For example,if the explosion in the
                silo cell can be assumed to be a secondary event, initiated by an explosion elsewherein
                the plant, ignition will probably occur in the upper part of the silo by flame transmission
                through dust extraction ducts or other openings near the silo top. In this case, a vent of
                moderate size serves the purpose, even if  the LID of  the silo is large. However, the
                analysis might reveal that ignition in the lower part of the silo is also probable, for exam-
                ple, because the dust has a great tendency to burn or smolder. In this case, even the entire
                silo roof, in some situations,may be insufficient for venting, and more sophisticatedmea-
                sures may have to be taken ts control possible dust explosions in the silo.


                6.3.4
                SMALLER, SLENDER ENCLOSURES OF LID > 4

                The data of Bartknecht (1988) and Radandt (1985,1989a) from experimentsin the 20 m3
                silo constitute a useful referencepoint. Further data for a 8.7 m3vessel of LID =6 is found
                in the paper by Lunn and Cairns (1985).However, it is necessary to pay adequate atten-
                tion to the way in which the dust clouds are generated in the various experiments and
   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491