Page 33 - Dynamics and Control of Nuclear Reactors
P. 33

24     CHAPTER 3 The point reactor kinetics equations




                            Dollar, $ (¼ ρ/β)
                            Cent, ¢ (¼ 0.01$)

                         Note that one dollar ($) of reactivity is numerically equal to β, the magnitude of the
                         total delayed neutron fraction. All of these measures are suitable, but a potential
                         cause for confusion. Reactivity, ρ, and dollar ($) or cent (¢), is used throughout
                         this book.




                         3.4 Alternate choices for the neutronic variable
                         In the above derivations of the point kinetics equations, the neutron density, n, was
                         chosen as the neutronic variable. Here, we show that the equations may be written
                         with neutron flux, reactor power or relative reactor power.
                            First use the relation, Φ¼nv, to replace the neutron density, n, with neutron flux,
                         Φ. The result is
                                                               6
                                                  dΦ  ð ρ βÞ  X
                                                    ¼      Φ +   λ i C 0 i              (3.18)
                                                  dt    Λ
                                                               i¼1
                                                     dC 0  β
                                                       i  ¼  i Φ λ i C 0                (3.19)
                                                     dt  Λ      i
                         where
                                                         0
                                                       C i ¼ vC i
                         Note that the precursor terms in this formulation are no longer actual precursor con-
                         centrations, but are the non-physical quantity, (v C i ). But since the solution variable
                         of interest is the neutron flux, the physical interpretation of the precursor variable is
                         inconsequential.
                            Now reformulate again with power as the variable of interest. Multiply
                         Eqs. (3.18) and (3.19) by (F Σ f V) where F is the conversion from fission rate to
                         power (  3.2 10  11  watt seconds per fission) and V is the reactor volume to obtain
                         power, P¼F Σ f Φ V. The result is
                                                               6
                                                  dP  ð ρ βÞ  X
                                                    ¼      P +   λ i C 00 i             (3.20)
                                                  dt    Λ
                                                              i¼1
                                                    dC 00  β
                                                       i  ¼  i  P λ i C 00              (3.21)
                                                     dt  Λ      i
                         where

                                                       00
                                                     C i ¼ FΣ f VC i
                         Finally reformulate with relative power, P/P(0), as the variable of interest. Here P(0)
                         is a nominal power; for example, the 100% power level. The result is
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38