Page 363 - Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
P. 363

0593_C10_fm  Page 344  Monday, May 6, 2002  2:57 PM





                       344                                                 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems





                       10.13 Closure
                       The work–energy principle is probably the most widely used of all the principles of
                       dynamics. The primary advantage of the work–energy principle is that it only requires
                       knowledge of velocities and not accelerations. Also, calculation of the work done is often
                       accomplished by inspection of the system configuration.
                        The major disadvantage of the work–energy principle is that only a single equation is
                       obtained. Hence, if there are several unknowns with a given mechanical system, at most
                       one of these can be obtained using the work–energy principle. This in turn means that
                       the principle is most advantageous for relatively simple mechanical systems. However,
                       the utility of the principle may often be enhanced by using it in tandem with other
                       dynamics principles — particularly impulse–momentum principles.
                        In the next two chapters we will consider more general energy methods. We will consider
                       the procedures of generalized dynamics, Lagrange’s equations, and Kane’s equations.
                       These procedures, while not as simple as those of the work–energy principle, have the
                       advantage of still being computationally efficient and of producing the same number of
                       equations as there are degrees of freedom of a system.





                       References (Accident Reconstruction)
                       10.1. Baker, J. S., Traffic Accident Investigation Manual, The Traffic Institute, Northwestern University,
                           Evanston, IL, 1975.
                       10.2. Backaitis, S. H., Ed., Reconstruction of Motor Vehicle Accidents: A Technical Compendium, Publi-
                           cation PT-34, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, PA, 1989.
                       10.3. Platt, F. N., The Traffic Accident Handbook, Hanrow Press, Columbia, MD, 1983.
                       10.4. Moffatt, E. A., and Moffatt, C. A., Eds., Highway Collision Reconstruction, American Society of
                           Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1980.
                       10.5. Gardner, J. D., and Moffatt, E. A., Eds., Highway Truck Collision Analysis, American Society of
                           Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1982.
                       10.6. Adler, U., Ed., Automotive Handbook, Robert Bosch, Stuttgart, Germany, 1986.
                       10.7. Collins, J. C., Accident Reconstruction, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1979.
                       10.8. Limpert, R., Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction and Cause Analysis, The Michie Company,
                           Low Publishers, Charlottesville, VA, 1978.
                       10.9. Noon, R., Introduction to Forensic Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1992.





                       Problems



                       Sections 10.2 and 10.3  Work
                       P10.2.1: A particle P moves on a curve C defined by the parametric equations:

                                                                2
                                                        t
                                                     x = ,  y =  t ,  z =  t 3
   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368