Page 206 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 206

Leading Small Groups: Theoretical Perspectives        189

                     adhering to the group’s task. We know this is unusual; most groups can and should
                     use the services of a designated leader. However, this case verifies the important point
                     that we made earlier: leadership belongs to the group.
                        There is support for distributed leadership. Barge compared two models of group
                     leadership—one in which the leader exerted active, directive influence in the group
                     and a leaderless model, in which all members engaged in the leadership process.  He
                                                                                   103
                     discovered that overall leadership activity, as opposed to the activity of the designated
                     leader alone, was the better predictor of group productivity. Barge concluded that
                     although an individual leader’s behavior may not necessarily help a group achieve its
                     goals, the overall group leadership behavior does. Gastil’s studies of small group
                     democracy show that democratic leadership distributes responsibility among mem-
                     bers, empowers them by improving their general abilities and leadership skills, and
                                                          104
                     helps the group in its decision-making process.  The self-managed work teams men-
                     tioned in Chapter 1 are unique because they are composed of peers who are leaders in   Leader as Completer
                     their own right and are good examples of shared or distributed leadership. This kind   A leader who
                     of leadership helps them build relationships together and learn about their task as a   functions as a
                     team, even forecasting who might lead on future projects. 105        participant-observer,
                        We hope you agree that it is good for the group and good for the members when   monitoring the
                     leadership is distributed among them. But you may be wondering, if members assume   group’s process,
                     leadership duties for the group, where does the leader fit in? The metaphor we suggest   noticing what is
                     is that the members are the bricks that provide support and substance to the group,   missing, and
                     and the leader is the mortar that binds them together and allows the group to hold its   providing what is
                     shape, as shown in Figure 7.3. This is the picture of the leader as completer, a   needed.


                                                                                          FIGURE 7.3  The
                                                                                          leader as “completer”
                                                                                          of the group
                                           Leader

                                                          Member A





                                      Member D
                                                                   Member B






                                                      Member C














          gal37018_ch07_169_196.indd   189                                                              3/28/18   12:36 PM
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211