Page 254 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 254

Problem Solving and Decision Making in Groups         237

                     Understanding How the Group’s Decision Will Be Made

                     Groups may use a number of different methods to make decisions. Among the most
                     common are the four described briefly here, with their advantages and disadvantages
                     outlined in Table 9.2. Group members should know at the outset how the decision
                     will be made. Hurt feelings— or worse— will occur if group members think they will
                     make the ultimate choice but the group leader actually ends up choosing, so clarify
                     this at the beginning of the process.


                     Decision Making by the Leader
                     Sometimes a designated or emergent leader thinks the problem through alone and
                     announces a decision. Group members are then given instructions for executing the
                     decision. The resulting solution may or may not be a high- quality one, but other



                     TABLE 9.2  Comparing advantages and disadvantages of four common decision- making methods
                      Decision- Making
                      Method           Advantages                         Disadvantages
                      By the Leader      • Can be high- quality decision if leader is     • Lacks others’ input, so may not be high
                                         an expert.                         quality.
                                         • Is fast.                         • Members may not support decision.
                                         • Group avoids anxiety/responsibility of     • May cause resentment, reduced
                                         decision making.                   cohesiveness, lack of motivation for
                                                                            future.
                      By the Leader,     • Can be high- quality decision.    • Members may resent decision if their
                      with Consultation    • Can be faster than having group   input isn’t used.
                                         decide.                            • “Losing” side may not support decision.
                                         • Especially useful if group cannot come     • May encourage members to duck hard
                                         to consensus.                      work of developing consensus.
                                         • Members appreciate opportunity to
                                         participate.
                      By Majority Vote    • Familiar procedure for Americans.    • Minority side may stay silent out of fear.
                                         • Each vote counts equally.        • Minority may resent outcome and not
                                         • Decision can be reached quickly.  support it.
                                                                            • Majority is not always right; decision
                                                                            may be flawed.

                      By Consensus       • All members support decision.    • Usually takes more time.
                                         • Members more satisfied and committed  • Members may feel pressured to

                                         to decision.                       conform.
                                         • Decision can be high quality, because     • May be hard or impossible to achieve.
                                         all viewpoints are taken into account.









          gal37018_ch09_225_258.indd   237                                                              3/28/18   12:37 PM
   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259