Page 364 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 364

Tools for Assessing and Evaluating Groups        347

                                                                                          FIGURE 12.6
                                              Profile of Jodi’s Remarks                    Pie chart displaying
                                                                                          Jodi’s behavioral
                                                                                          functions
















                            Information Giving       Opinion Giving          Evaluating
                            Harmonizing              Tension Relieving       Dramatizing




                     answers, opinions), styles of conflict management (e.g., self-oriented, other-oriented,
                     issue-oriented), and so forth. It is important for the observers to classify the remarks
                     consistently so that the same behavior is classified in the same way by two observers,
                     or by one observer at two different times.

                     SYMLOG: Drawing a Snapshot of a Group                                SYMLOG
                     SYMLOG, which is an acronym for the System for the Multiple Level Observation of   System for the
                     Groups, is both a theory and a methodology that permits a three-dimensional diagram   Multiple Level
                     to be constructed of a group.  Such diagrams can be constructed by outside observers   Observation of
                                           9
                     and consultants or by the group members themselves. Examples of such diagrams are   Groups, both a
                     provided in Figure 12.7 and Figure 12.8. (Instructions for producing a simplified   theory about member
                     SYMLOG-like diagram are included in the Instructor’s Manual.) You can see, even   characteristics and
                                                                                          effects on group
                     without detailed information about SYMLOG theory, that the first group (Figure 12.7)   interaction, and a
                     is fragmented and polarized, but the second (Figure 12.8) is unified and cohesive.  methodology that
                        SYMLOG theory rests on the assumption that behavior of each group member in   produces a three-
                     a group can be classified along each of three independent dimensions: dominant ver-  dimensional
                     sus submissive; friendly versus unfriendly; and task-oriented versus emotionally   “snapshot” of a group
                             10
                     expressive.  SYMLOG may be used in one of two ways. With the scoring method,   at a given point in
                     external observers score the verbal and nonverbal behaviors of members as they   time.
                       interact in real time. The rating method is easier, requiring no special training; exter-
                     nal observers or group members themselves complete a 26-question rating scale eval-
                     uating each member’s behavior. The results are tallied in a particular way so each
                     member can be placed on the SYMLOG diagram.
                        Each of the three dimensions is represented by a pair of letters that anchor the
                     pole positions. For example, P (positive) stands for friendly and N (negative) stands









          gal37018_ch12_321_352.indd   347                                                              3/28/18   12:38 PM
   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369